1887

Abstract

Summary

Assuming transverse anisotropy, elastic properties and anisotropy of rock formations at depth are usually determined in the laboratory using a cylindrical rock sample, preferably plugged orthogonal to the symmetry plane. Such anisotropy is usually caused by bedding or laminations when present. On the other hand, permeability anisotropy evaluation requires a pair of companion samples cored along and orthogonal to the bedding plane. Shaly cores recovered from the well often experience drying, desiccation and stress-relief fracturing when not properly preserved, which makes it difficult to sub-sample standard-size cylindrical plugs. Therefore, we developed a new laboratory approach to test relatively small cubic rock samples without modifying existing pressure vessel equipment designed for standard cylindrical samples. This approach is tested on the Opalinus Clay and validated by comparing the elastic anisotropy results, in term of Thomsen's parameters, obtained on a parent specimen and three cubes extracted from it. We demonstrate that elastic anisotropy parameters inferred from the cubes are accurate as long as a small, homogeneous and representative samples of the formation can be recovered. If this condition is fulfilled, permeability anisotropy can also be successfully determined from small cubic samples using a dedicated permeameter designed for tight and low permeability cylindrical rock samples.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900292
2019-04-28
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bhandari, A.R., P.B.Flemings, P.J.Polito, M.B.Cronin, S.L.Bryant
    . [2015] Anisotropy and stress dependence of permeability in the Barnett shale. Transport in porous media108, no. 2 (2015): 393–411.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Clavaud, J-B., A.Maineult, M.Zamora, P.Rasolofosaon, C.Schlitter
    [2008] Permeability anisotropy and its relations with porous medium structure. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth113, no. B1.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dewhurst, D.N., A.F.Siggins
    [2006] Impact of Fabric, Microcracks and Stress Field on Shale Anisotropy. Geophysical Journal International165 (1): 135–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02834.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kovalyshen, Y., J.Sarout, J.Dautriat
    . [2016] Inversion of ultrasonic data for transversely isotropic media.” Geophysics82, no. 1: C1–C7.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Pan, Z., Y.Ma, N. N.Danesh, L.D.Connell, R.Sander, D.I.Down, M.Camilleri
    [2015] Measurement of shale anisotropic permeability and its impact on shale gas production.” In SPE Asia Pacific Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sarout, J., L.Esteban, C.Delle Piane, B.Maney, D.N.Dewhurst
    . [2014] Elastic anisotropy of Opalinus Clay under variable saturation and triaxial stress. Geophysical Journal International198, no. 3: 1662–1682. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu231
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Thomsen, L.
    [1986] Weak Elastic Anisotropy. Geophysics51(10) (5): 1954–66. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442051.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900292
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900292
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error