1887

Abstract

Summary

The paper intends to provide an insight into a large scale experimental campaign incorporating numerical simulations to develop understanding and to, refine the shale failure geometry stabilization mechanism and criteria. The paper also discusses the technical details, considerations and observations of the large scale mechanical rock testing campaign (including triaxial and polyaxial block test) which were carried out on 2 shales. The results of the induced onset of breakout and stabilized breakout geometry were laser scanned, measured and compared with the 3D finite element numerical simulation predictions. The outcome of the research is applied in well design considerations, predicts wellbore stability in 3D and offers valuable insights to the well design team. The results provide visualization of the extent and magnitude of the mechanical wellbore damage whilst drilling in shale formations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900306
2019-04-28
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bell, J. S. and Gough, D. I.
    (1979). Northeast-southwest compressive stress in Alberta: Evidence from oil wells, Earth Planet. Sci. Letter, 45, 475–482, 1979.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cease, H. D.
    (2006). Measurement of Mechanical Properties of Three Epoxy Adhesives at Cryogenic Temperatures for CCD Construction. Fermilan-TM-2366-A
    [Google Scholar]
  3. TerraTek
    (2016a). Triaxial Tests on Pierre II Shale and Wellington Shale. Schlumberger Reservoir Laboratory, Salt Lake City, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Wu, B. and Tan, C.P.
    , (1998). Borehole Failure Characteristics in Shale- Evidence from Hollow Cylinder Tests. 5th South American Conf. Sarock’98, Santos, Brazil, pp. 429–437.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Zoback, M.D., Moos, D., Mastin, L. and Anderson, R.N.
    (1985). Wellbore breakouts and in-situ stress. 1. Geophys. Res.90, B7: 5523–5530.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900306
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900306
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error