1887

Abstract

Summary

The strain rate dependent mechanical behavior of shale was extensively characterized using triaxial compression tests carried out at different axal strain rates. Based on the experimental results, a constitutive model for shale under different rates of loading was proposed. The model is based on a combination of viscoelasticity and damage mechanics and is formulated to predict the brittle behavior of shales from the pre-peak stage, peak and post peak strain softening regimes. Shear failure and strain softening are attributed to damage due to the growth of fractures in the shale, and de-bonding and decohesion mechanisms responsible for the fracture evolution. Damage is described by a scalar variable D and is assumed to commence when the stress-strain behavior deviates from linear elasticity. It was found that damage evolution during shearing in shale can be adequately represented probabilistically using a Weibull probability distribution function based on the axial strain level. An empirical axial strain rate dependent Young's modulus, together with the damage evolution law, completes the viscoelastic damage model. The model is shown to adequately represent the complete stress-strain response of shale at different axial strain rates and to predict the axial strain rate dependent shear strength of shale.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900327
2019-04-28
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arora, S. and Mishra, B.
    [2017]. Investigation of the failure mode of shale rocks in biaxial and triaxial compression tests. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 79, 109–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ayatollahi, M.R. and Aliha, M.R.M.
    [2008]. On the use of Brazilian disc specimen for calculating mixed mode I-II fracture toughness of rock materials. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 75(16), 631–4641.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dewhurst, D.N. and Hennig, A.L.
    [2003] Geomechanical properties related to top seal leakage in the Carnarvon Basin, Northwest Shelf, Australia. Petroleum Geoscience, 9(3), 255–263.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Francesco, P., Sergio, S. and Lyesse, L.
    [2015] Constitutive analysis of shale: a coupled damage plasticity approach. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 75–76, 88–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mahanta. B., Tripathy, A., Vishal, V., Singh, T.N. and Ranjith, P.G.
    [2016] Effects of strain rate on fracture toughness and energy release rate of gas shales. Engineering Geology, 218, 39–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Middleton, R.S., Carey, W.J., Currier, R.P., Hyman, J.D., Kang, Q., Karra, S., Jiménez-Martínez, J., Porter, M.L. and Viswanathan, H.S.
    [2015] Shale gas and non-aqueous fracturing fluids: opportunities and challenges for supercritical CO2. Applied Energy, 147(3), 500–509.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Nygaard, R., Gutierrez, M., Brattli, R.K. and Høeg, K.
    [2005] Brittle-ductile transition, shear failure and leakage in mudrocks from the North Sea and adjacent areas. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 23, 201–212.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhao, J.
    [2000] Applicability of Mohr-Coulomb and Hoek-Brown strength criteria to the dynamic strength of brittle rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences.37(7), 1115–1121.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900327
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900327
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error