1887

Abstract

Summary

In the papers of G.E. Archie and V.N. Dakhnov was estimated dependence between resistivity (or conductivity) of soil and porous water. Existence of such dependence shows that we should know water resistivity, that means study it at each fieldwork area. Sometimes places for measurements of underground water resistivity at each area are restricted, in such case we can measure water resistivity in puddles. Water in puddles immediately after rain has no relation with soil resistivity. The purpose of our study consists in determination the rules of ionic exchange between soil and rain water in time. In the paper (Brunet et al., 2010) the authors demonstrated results of water resistivity measurements at contact with soil in time. They found that two days after the rain water resistivity is close to value of underground water. We wanted to check results of that experiment. Our data in the whole coincide with Brunet results, but are slightly different in details.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901681
2019-04-16
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ДахновВ.Н.
    Электрическая разведка нефтяных и газовых месторождений. Л.: Гостоптехиздат, 1951. 428 с.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. МатвеевB.C., РыжовА.А.
    Геофизическое обеспечение региональных гидрогеологических, инженерно-геологических, геокриологических и геоэкологических исследований. 2006, Разведка и охрана недр, №2, 2006, с.50-57.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Электроразведка: пособие по электроразведочной практике для студентов геофизических специальностей. Том II. Малоглубинная электроразведка. Под редакцией проф. В.А.Шевнина, доц. А.А. Бобачева – М.: 2013. Гл. 16. Резистивиметрия.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Archie, G.E.
    (1942) The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans. Am. Inst. Mining Met. Eng., 146, 54 – 62.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BrunetP., ClementR., BouvierC.
    Monitoring soil water content and deficit using Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) – A case study in the Cevennes area, France. Journal of Hydrology, 380, (2010), 146–153
    [Google Scholar]
  6. DakhnovV.N.
    Electrical prospecting of oil and gas deposits. L.: Gostoptekhizdat, 1951. 428 pp. (In Russian)
    [Google Scholar]
  7. MatveevV.C., RyjovA.A.
    Geofizicheskoe obespechenie regional'nyh gidrogeologicheskih, inzhenerno-geologicheskih, geokriologicheskih i geojekologicheskih issledovanij. 2006, Razvedka I ohrana nedr, 2006, N 2, pp. 50–57. (In Russian)
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Electrical methods for student geophysical practice. V. II. Nearsurface electrical methods – BobachevA.A. et al.M.: MSU, 2013. – 123 p. Polypress edition, Tver. Ch.16 Resistivimetria. (In Russian)
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Archie, G.E.
    (1942) The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans. Am. Inst. Mining Met. Eng., 146, 54 – 62.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. BrunetP., ClementR., BouvierC.
    Monitoring soil water content and deficit using Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) – A case study in the Cevennes area, France. Journal of Hydrology, 380, (2010), 146–153
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901681
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901681
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error