1887

Abstract

Summary

The report presents marine Overhauser magnetometers developed and produced in the Quantum Magnetometry Lab of the Ural Federal University, Russia. The general design of Overhauser magnetometers and working radical properties are considered. In particular, we discuss a radical used in our land-based and marine magnetometers distinguished by increased stability and special properties of the Heisenberg exchange allowing for signal amplification. We present several examples of actual geophysical measurements using SeaPOS-1 and SeaPOS-2 magnetometers. We consider in details an influence of the vessel magnetic moment on the measurement results. In the experiment the ship passed at different azimuths and distances to the magnetometer placed inside the nonmagnetic anchored rubber boat. Theoretical and experimental results showed that due to interaction of magnetic fields the vessel impact on the measurement can be significant.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901832
2019-04-22
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Denisov, A.Y., Denisova, O.V., Sapunov, V.A.
    [2006] Measurement quality estimation of proton-precession magnetometers. Earth, Planets and Space, 58(6), 707–710.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Denisov, A.Yu.
    [2000] Improvement of digital nuclear precession geomagnetometers (PhD thesis, Ural Polytechnic Institute, Ekaterinburg, Russia)
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Denisov, A.Yu., Sapunov, V.A. and Dikusar, O.V.
    [1999] Calculation of the error in the measurements of a digital-processor nuclear-precession magnetometer. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 39(6), 737–742.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Denisova, O.V.
    , [2005] Digital methods for monitoring and improving the quality of measurements of nuclear-precessional geomagnetometers (PhD thesis, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia)
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hrovoic, I. and Myzyk, J.
    [1983] High sensitivity portable/base station magnetometer based on Overhauser effect. Ontario Geological Survey Miscellaneous Paper, 115, 39–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kernevez, N., Glenat, H.
    [1991] Description of a high sensitivity CW scalar DNP-NMR Magnetometer (1991)IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 27 (6), pp. 5402–5404
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Pomerancev, N., Rydgkov, V., Skrocky, G.
    [1972], Physical Bases of Quantum Magnetometry, pp. 157–167
    [Google Scholar]
  8. RussiaSapunov, V., Denisov, A., Denisova, O. and Saveliev, D.
    [2001] Proton and Overhauser magnetometers metrology. Contributions to Geophysics & Geodesy, 31(1), 119–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Sapunov, V.A.
    [1988] Dynamic polarization of nuclei of proton-containing solutions of nitroxyl radicals in a weak magnetic field (PhD thesis, Ural Polytechnic Institute, Sverdlovsk, USSR)
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Sapunov, V.A., Doroshek, A.S., Sobolev, A.S., Kiselev, S.E., Chirkov, A.K., Skibida, I.P., Shashin, S.S., Emanuel, O.N.
    [1988] Magnetometer with dynamic nuclear polarization. Certificate of Authorship No.1484103. [in Russian]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sapunov, V.A., Narkhov, E.D., Fedorov, A.L., Sergeev, A. and Denisov, A.Y.
    [2015] Ground Overhauser DNP geophysical devices. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, 215–222.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901832
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901832
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error