1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 67, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 67 Number 4
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Fluid conductivity and elastic properties in fractures depend on the aperture geometry – in particular, the roughness of fracture surfaces. In this study, we have characterized the surface roughness with a log‐normal distribution and investigated the transport and flow behaviour of the fractures with varying roughness characteristics. Numerical flow and transport simulations have been performed on a single two‐dimensional fracture surface, whose aperture geometry changes with different variances and correlation lengths in each realization. We have found that conventional measurement of hydraulic conductivity alone is insufficient to determine these two parameters. Transient transport measurements, such as the particle breakthrough time, provide additional constraints to the aperture distribution. Nonetheless, a unique solution to the fracture aperture distribution is still under‐determined with both hydraulic conductivity and transport measurements. From numerical simulations at different compression states, we have found that the flow and transport measurements exhibit different rates of changes with respect to changes in compression. Therefore, the fracture aperture distribution could be further constrained by considering the flow and transport properties under various compression states.

© 2019 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2018 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12680
2018-09-12
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12680
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bakulin, A., Grechka, V. and Tsvankin, I.2000. Estimation of fracture parameters from reflection seismic data? Part I: HTI model due to a single fracture set. Geophysics65, 1788–1802.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkowitz, B.2002. Characterizing flow and transport in fractured geological media: A review. Advances in Water Resources25, 861–884.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, S.R.1987. Fluid flow through rock joints: the effect of surface roughness. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth92, 1337–1347.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, S.R.1989. Transport of fluid and electric current through a single fracture. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth94, 9429–9438.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, S.R.1995. Simple mathematical model of a rough fracture. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth100, 5941–5952.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, S. R. and Scholz, C. H.1985. Closure of random elastic surfaces in contact. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth90, 5531–5545.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, S.R. and Scholz, C. H.1986. Closure of rock joints. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth91, 4939–4948.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cho, Y., Ozkan, E. and Apaydin, O. G.2013. Pressure‐dependent natural‐fracture permeability in shale and its effect on shale‐gas well production. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering16, 216–228.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Feng, Q., Fardin, N., Jing, L. and Stephansson, O.2003. A new method for in‐situ non‐contact roughness measurement of large rock fracture surfaces. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering36, 3–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Gangi, A.F.1978. Variation of whole and fractured porous rock permeability with confining pressure. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts15, 249–257.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Greenwood, J. and Williamson, J.P.1966. Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society: A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, Great Britain, December 1966, pp.300–319. The Royal Society Publishing.
  12. Hertz, H.1881. Über die Berührung fester elastischer Körper. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik92, 156–171.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Kang, P.K., Anna, P., Nunes, J.P., Bijeljic, B., Blunt, M. J. and Juanes, R.2014. Pore‐scale intermittent velocity structure under‐ pinning anomalous transport through 3‐d porous media. Geophysical Research Letters41, 6184–6190.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Kang, P.K., Brown, S. and Juanes, R.2016. Emergence of anomalous transport in stressed rough fractures. Earth and Planetary Science Letters454, 46–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Kang, P.K., Dentz, M., Le Borgne, T. and Juanes, R.2011. Spatial markov model of anomalous transport through random lattice networks. Physical Review Letters107, 180602.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Kang, P.K., Dentz, M., Le Borgne, T. and Juanes, R.2015. Anomalous transport on regular fracture networks: Impact of conductivity heterogeneity and mixing at fracture intersections. Physical Review E92, 022148.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Koyama, T., Li, B., Jiang, Y. and Jing, L.2008. Numerical simulations for the effects of normal loading on particle transport in rock fractures during shear. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences45, 1403–1419.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu, E.2005. Effects of fracture aperture and roughness on hydraulic and mechanical properties of rocks: implication of seismic characterization of fractured reservoirs. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering2, 38–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ma, J.H.Y., Li, Y.E. and Cheng, A.2017. The effects of aperture distribution and compression on transport properties in rock fractures. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017, pp.3945–3949. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  20. Min, K.‐B., Rutqvist, J., Tsang, C.‐F. and Jing, L.2004. Stress‐dependent permeability of fractured rock masses: A numerical study. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences41, 1191–1210.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Newman, J. and Raju, I.1981. An empirical stress‐intensity factor equation for the surface crack. Engineering Fracture Mechanics15, 185–192.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Palmer, I. and Mansoori, J.1996. How permeability depends on stress and pore pressure in coalbeds: A new model. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, October 1996. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
  23. Pyrak‐Nolte, L. and Morris, J.2000. Single fractures under normal stress: The relation between fracture specific stiffness and fluid flow. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 37, 245–262.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Pyrak‐Nolte, L.J., Myer, L.R., Cook, N.G. and Witherspoon, P.A.1987. Hydraulic and mechanical properties of natural fractures in low permeability rock. 6th ISRM Congress. International Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.
  25. Rice, J.1988. Elastic fracture mechanics concepts for interfacial cracks. Journal of Applied Mechanics (Trans. ASME)55, 98–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Ruan, F. and McLaughlin, D.1998. An efficient multivariate random field generator using the fast fourier transform. Advances in Water Resources21, 385–399.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Sayers, C. and Kachanov, M.1995. Microcrack‐induced elastic wave anisotropy of brittle rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth100, 4149–4156.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Seidle, J., Jeansonne, M., Erickson, D.1992. Application of matchstick geometry to stress dependent permeability in coals. SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, Casper, WY, May 1992. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
  29. Sun, J. and Schechter, D.2015. Investigating the effect of improved fracture conductivity on production performance of hydraulically fractured wells: Field‐case studies and numerical simulations. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology54, 442–449.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Swan, G.1981. Stiffness and associated joint properties of rocks. Proceedings of the Conference on the Application of Rock Mechanics to Cut and Fill Mining, Sweden, June 1980, pp.169–178. The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy.
  31. Tsang, Y.W. and Tsang, C.1987. Channel model of flow through fractured media. Water Resources Research23, 467–479.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Vidic, R.D., Brantley, S.L., Vandenbossche, J.M., Yoxtheimer, D. and Abad, J.D.2013. Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality. Science340, 1235009.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Walsh, J. and Grosenbaugh, M.1979. A new model for analyzing the effect of fractures on compressibility. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth84, 3532–3536.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang, Z. and Nemcik, J.2013. Fluid flow regimes and nonlinear flow characteristics in deformable rock fractures. Journal of Hydrology477, 139–151.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Zimmerman, R.W., Al‐Yaarubi, A., Pain, C.C. and Grattoni, C.A.2004. Non‐linear regimes of fluid flow in rock fractures. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences41, 163–169.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Zimmerman, R., Kumar, S. and Bodvarsson, G.1991. Lubrication theory analysis of the permeability of rough‐walled fractures. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics Abstracts28, 325–331.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Zimmerman, R.W. and Bodvarsson, G.S.1996. Hydraulic conductivity of rock fractures. Transport in Porous Media23, 1–30.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12680
Loading
Dependency of flow and transport properties on aperture distributions and compression states
Geophysical Prospecting 67, 900 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12680
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12680
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12680
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Aperture distribution; Compression; Fluid transports; Heterogeneous fracture surface; Hydraulic conductivity

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error