1887

Abstract

Summary

Stereotomography is a distinctive tomographic method. It is capable of estimating the reflector position, the local dip of reflector and the macro velocity simultaneously. In the previous work, we extend the 2D stereotomography from the B-spline based model representation to triangulated-mesh based model representation In this abstract, we further extend 2D stereotomography in triangulated model to 3D Stereotomography in Tetrahedral model. Firstly we construct the 3D stereotomography (frechet) matrix for Tetrahedral model in the 3D Cartesian coordinate. All the first-order derivatives of the data components with respect to the model components needed by 3D stereotomography in Tetrahedral model are derived based on the ray perturbation theory for interfaces. Then a sensitivity test is implemented to verify the correctness of the frechet derivatives. Finally, we present two synthetic data examples to demonstrate the correctness of the presented algorithm. It provides a solid foundation for its later real applications.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901368
2019-06-03
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Billette, F., and Lambaré, G.
    , 1998, Velocity macro-model estimation from seismic reflection data by Stereotomography. Geophy. J. Int., 135(2): 671–680.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. FarraV., JeanVirieus and RaúlMadariaga
    , 1989, Ray perturbation theory for interfaces, Geophys. J. Int., 99:377–390.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Guillaume, P., Zhang, P.X. & Prescott, A.
    , 2013. Multi-layer non-linear slope tomography, 75th EAGE Conference & Exhibition (Expanded Abstracts), London, UK, Th 04 01.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Li,Z.W. Li, Yang, K., Xiong, K., Ni, Y., Wang, Y.X.
    , 2015, Towards an Edge-preserving Stereotomography with a Practical Model Regularization Technique. EAGE, Expanded Abstracts, We P1 03.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Yang, K., ShaoW., D., XingF., Y.
    , 2018, Stereotomography in triangulated models, Geophysical Journal of International, 214, 1018–1040.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901368
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901368
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error