1887

Abstract

Summary

An important objective of the seismic exploration is assessment of the tectonic overprint. If available, 3D reflection seismic data is preferred as it provides the highest resolution of the subsurface images. Faults or fractures are typically indirectly analysed by interpreting discontinuities in vertical or horizontal reflection seismic images. Seismic diffractions represent a direct wavefield response from these tectonic features and thus allow for a more straight forward assessment of the tectonic overprint and mapping fracture density. We investigate a dedicated processing of seismic diffractions which comprises an azimuthal diffraction imaging.

The method is based on diffraction focusing. After reflections are removed from prestack data, diffracted waves are focused into their apexes yielding images of scatterers and edges. These images can be interpreted as an extent of inhomogeneities. We apply Kirchhoff time migration for a number of azimuths to focus diffractions. We also evaluate the coherence along the time-migration operators. Diffractions from the scattering points have a different phase response than diffractions from edges. This difference is acknowledged during the coherence evaluation. To further supress reflection left-overs, we apply a dynamic operator muting. This provides volumes of focused diffraction amplitudes, azimuthal orientation of faults, and coherence evaluated along the migration operators.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901372
2019-06-03
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berkovitch, A., and Belfer, I., and Hassin, Y. and Landa, E.
    [2009] Diffraction imaging by multifocusing.Geophysics, 74(6), WCA75–WCA81.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dell, S. and Gajewski, D.
    [2011] Common-reflection-surface-based workflow for diffraction imaging.Geophysics, 76(5), S187–S195.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dell, S., Hölker, A. and Gajewski, D.
    [2019] Using seismic diffractions for assessment of tectonic overprint and fault interpretation.Geophysics, 84(1), IM1–IM10.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fomel, S., Landa, E. and Taner, M. T.
    [2006] Poststack velocity analysis by separation and imaging of seismic diffractions.Geophysics, 72(6), U89–U94.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Klem-Musatov, K.
    [1994] Theory of seismic diffractions. SEG Publications.
  6. Khaidukov, V., Landa, E. and Moser, T. J.
    [2004] Diffraction imaging by focusing-defocusing: An outlook on seismic superresolution.Geophysics, 69(6), 1478–1490.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Klokov, A. and Fomel, S.
    [2012] Separation and imaging of seismic diffractions using migrated dip-angle gathers.Geophysics, 77(6), S131–S143.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Landa, E. and Keydar, S.
    [1998] Seismic monitoring of diffraction images for detection of local heterogeneities.Geophysics, 63(3), 1093–1100.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Moser, T. J. and Howard, C. B.
    [2008] Diffraction imaging in depth.Geophysical Prospecting, 56(5), 627–641.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901372
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901372
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error