1887

Abstract

Summary

Oil production as well water and gas injection change the mechanical structure of hydrocarbon reservoirs leading to compaction, which has high impact on the reservoir quality. Compaction increases the grain contact adhesion and frictional sliding which are responsible for increasing rock stiffness and hysteresis. In addition, elastic moduli, such as Young modulus, are highly influenced by stress, fractures, and cracks. This work analyses how hysteresis depends on the elastic properties and petrophysical parameters through laboratory tests carried out on 05 sandstones and 03 carbonate core samples. The results indicated that hysteresis is severely dependent on depositional texture, and it is directly related to Young modulus and Bulk modulus. Tight rocks exhibited higher hysteresis than friable rocks, due to frictional sliding and grain contact adhesion, which causes permanent damage to pore structure. Porosity displays an inverse relation to hysteresis, as high pore density enables rock's matrix to deform and recover its shape without frictional sliding and grain contact adhesion.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901435
2019-06-03
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. American Petroleum Institute
    . [1998] Recommended practices for core analysis, second edition: Recommended Practice RP40, variously paginated
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Harthy, S. S.; Dennis, J. W.; Jing, X. D.; Marsden, J. R.
    [1998] Hysteresis, true-triaxial stress-path and pore pressure effects on permeability. SPE/Eurock 98 Conf., Trondheim, SPE 47629, p. 9. https://doi.org/10.2118/47269‑MS
    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2118/47269-MS [Google Scholar]
  3. Hart, D. J., Wang, H. F.
    [1995] Laboratory measurements of a complete set of poroelastic moduli for Berea sandstone and Indiana limestone, J Geophys Res10017741–17751. https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB01242
    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB01242 [Google Scholar]
  4. Manhães, D. K. P., Fasolo, R. S., Misságia, R. M., Ceia, M. A. R.
    [2018] Petrophysical-hysteresis analysis related to pore structure of sedimentary rocks. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018. August 2018, 3578–3582. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2018‑2998398.1
    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2018-2998398.1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Mavko, G., MukerjiT., Dvorkin, J.
    [2009] The Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for Seismic Analysis in Porous Media. Cambridge University Press, 511p.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hantschel, T., KaueraufA. I.
    [2009] Pore Pressure, Compaction and Tectonics. In: Fundamentals of Basin and Petroleum Systems Modeling. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sharma, M. M., and A. N.Tutuncu
    [1994] Grain contact adhesion hysteresis: A mechanism for attenuation of seismic waves in sedimentary granular media: Geophysical Research Letters, 21, 2323–2326. https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL02056
    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL02056 [Google Scholar]
  8. Tutuncu, A. N., Sharma, M.M., Podio, A.M.
    [1995] A discussion on possible mechanisms of nonlinear hysteretic behavior in sedimentary granular rocks: Grain contact adhesion versus stick-slip sliding. SEG Technical Program: Expanded Abstracts. P.679–682. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1887392
    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1887392 [Google Scholar]
  9. Walsh, J.B.
    [1965] The effect of cracks on the uniaxial compression of rock. J. Geophys. Res.70: 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i002p00399
    https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i002p00399 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901435
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901435
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error