1887

Abstract

Summary

The orientation of hydraulic fractures controls the productivity of hydrocarbon reservoirs. Productivity from low permeability formations is greatly improved having multiple fractures oriented transversely rather than longitudinally, relative to a horizontal wellbore. Closed form, analytically-derived criteria are presented for the orientation of fracture initiation from perforated horizontal wellbores drilled in porous-permeable (poroelastic) media.

Fracture initiation often follows a plane different to the final fracture propagation plane. Stress reorientation in the near-wellbore region may promote fracture initiation of different orientation than the one dictated by the far-field stresses. In horizontal wells it is easier to achieve longitudinal fracture initiation, as transverse initiation only occurs over a narrow wellbore pressure-at-breakdown window; while longitudinal initiation occurs at comparatively higher wellbore pressures. Moreover, a critical tensile strength value exists, which determines the orientation of fracture initiation for a given stress state and rock Poisson's ratio.

The smaller Biot's poroelastic coefficient (αΒ) is, the more the stress states in which transverse fracture initiation will be promoted (see image). Case studies ran on unconventional gas reservoirs (see table) assess the likely orientation of fracture initiation from perforated wellbores in these regions, explaining how the orientation of fracture initiation is determined.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901438
2019-06-03
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hossain, M. M., et al.
    [2000], “Hydraulic Fracture Initiation and Propagation: Roles of Wellbore Trajectory, Perforation and Stress Regimes.” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 27, no. 3-4, pp. 129–149., doi: 10.1016/s0920‑4105(00)00056‑5.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0920-4105(00)00056-5 [Google Scholar]
  2. Hubbert, M. K., and Willis, D. G.
    [1957], Mechanics Of Hydraulic Fracturing. SPE.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kirsch, G.
    [1898], Die theorie der elasticitaet und die beduerfnisse der festigkeitskehre. VDI-Z42, 707
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Michael, A.
    [2016], Hydraulic Fracturing Optimization: Experimental Investigation of Multiple Fracture Growth Homogeneity via Perforation Cluster Distribution. Master's Report at UT Austin.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Michael, A., Olson, J. E., and Balhoff, M. T.
    [2018], Analysis of Hydraulic Fracture Initiation From Perforated Horizontal Wellbores. American Rock Mechanics Association. Seattle, WA, 17-20 June
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Moos, D.
    [2012], “Geosciences Technology Workshop (Hydraulic Fracturing).” AAPG, Search and Discovery Article #80533, 14 Sept.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Vako, P., and Economides, M. J.
    [1995], Hydraulic Fracture Mechanics. Chichester: Wiley, Print.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Weijers, L.
    [1995], The Near-wellbore Geometry of Hydraulic Fractures Initiated from Horizontal and Deviated Wells, Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Zoback, M. D.
    [2014], Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, Print.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901438
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901438
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error