1887

Abstract

Summary

The surface-wave modal inversion is generally the final step in various surface-wave exploration methods. The most widely used inversion strategies are the iterative-linear methods, which usually only invert S-wave velocities while keep other parameters, including the thickness of each layer, as known a priori. Though easy implementation and fast computation, these strategies make the establishment of an appropriate initial model a time-consuming process, especially when other priori information is unavailable. We propose an inversion strategy that simultaneously inverts S-wave velocity and layer thickness, within the frame of iterative-linearization. To enhance the stability of this inversion strategy, we have made a comprehensive application of a logarithmic transform and the smoothness constraint on model. Additionally, the elements of the Jacobian matrix are calculated by an analytical method combining the Implicit Function Theorem and the reduced delta matrix. A synthetic example and a field data demonstrate that the proposed strategy has a comparable computation efficiency and stability as the traditional Vs-only iterative-linear inversion methods, and meanwhile, makes the building of initial model more straightforward. This inversion strategy can be used alone or be used jointly with the traditional schemes to considerably facilitate the building of initial model for surface-wave exploration methods.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901455
2019-06-03
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cercato, M.
    [2007] Computation of partial derivatives of Rayleigh-wave phase velocity using second-order subdeterminants. Geophysical Journal International, 170(1), 217–238.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cox, B. R. and Teague, D. P.
    [2016] Layering ratios: a systematic approach to the inversion of surface wave data in the absence of a priori information. Geophysical Journal International, 207(1), 422–438.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lin, S. and Ashlock, J. C.
    [2014] Multimode Rayleigh wave profiling by hybrid surface and borehole methods. Geophysical Journal International, 197(2), 1184–1195.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Rix, G. J.
    [2005] Near-surface site characterization using surface waves. In: Surface Waves in Geomechanics: Direct and Inverse Modelling for Soil and Rocks (C. G.Lai and K.Wilmanski, eds.). New York: Springer-Verlag, 1–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Senkaya, M. and Karsli, H.
    [2016] Joint inversion of Rayleigh-wave dispersion data and vertical electric sounding data: synthetic tests on characteristic sub-surface models. Geophysical Prospecting, 64(1), 228–246.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Tran, K. T. and Hiltunen, D. R.
    [2012] Two-dimensional inversion of full waveform using simulated annealing. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 138(9), 1075–1090.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Watson, T. H.
    [1970] A note on fast computation of Rayleigh wave dispersion in the multilayered elastic half-space. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 60(1), 161–166.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Yin, X., Xia, J., Shen, C., Xu, H.
    [2014] Comparative analysis on penetrating depth of high-frequency Rayleigh and Love waves. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 111, 86–94.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901455
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901455
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error