1887

Abstract

Summary

In surface-to-borehole and borehole-to-surface electromagnetic methods, a hybrid measurement system is implemented where a surface or downhole source is used to energize the subsurface, and the field distribution is measured along the wellbore or on the surface. Under ideal experimental conditions, these methods provide higher sensitivity to changes in formation resistivity than surface-based methods (e.g., land controlled-source electromagnetic). In practice, downhole electric field measurements can only be done in an open hole, underneath the casing shoe, while borehole antennas can be deployed inside or below the steel casing. In either case, current is channeled along the casing medium and, thereby, the formation is effectively energized by a distributed source. Interpreting the measurements requires understanding the distortion introduced by the casing and the interaction of the metallic medium with a generally anisotropic surrounding medium. We present a review of the effect of the steel casing in a representative 1D scenario of an electrical anisotropic formation in a surface-to-borehole configuration, and the analysis is expanded by deriving closed-form expressions of the fields due to a source embedded in an infinite homogeneous and anisotropic surrounding medium.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901491
2019-06-03
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Colombo, D, and McNeice, G.W.
    [2013] Quantifying surface-to-reservoir electromagnetics for waterflood monitoring in a Saudi Arabian carbonate reservoir. GEOPHYSICS, 78(6), E281–E29.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Colombo, D., and McNeice, G.W.
    [2018] Surface to borehole CSEM for waterflood monitoring in Saudi Arabia: data analysis. 88th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 868–872.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Colombo, D., McNeice, G.W., Cuevas, N., and Pezzoli, M.
    [2018] Surface to Borehole Electromagnetics for Waterflood Monitoring: Results from First Field Deployment. SPE-191544-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cuevas, N.
    [2014] Analytical solutions of EM fields due to a dipolar source inside an infinite casing. Geophysics, 79(5), E231–E241, doi: 10.1190/geo2013‑0223.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2013-0223.1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cuevas, Colombo, D., McNeice, G., Denaclara, H., Minto, J., Yamasaki, T., Aoki, R., Pezzoli, M., Andreis, D., and Roper, T.
    [2015] Field Testing and Characterization of a Transmitter-receiver System for Surface to Borehole Electromagnetic Surveys. 77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstract.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cuevas, N., and Pezzoli, M.
    [2018] On the effect of the metal casing in surface-borehole electromagnetic methods. GEOPHYSICS, 83(3), E173–E187, 10.1190/GEO2017‑0055.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO2017-0055.1 [Google Scholar]
  7. Wilt, M. and Ranganayaki, R.P.
    [1990] Surface-to-borehole electromagnetic logging for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) applications. 60th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 532–534.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901491
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901491
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error