1887

Abstract

Summary

This study performs an integrated method using thin section and well log data to determine rock fabrics and their relationship with rock pore system in the Miocene carbonate reservoirs of well RR02, Southern Red River Basin, Vietnam. By carrying out thin section analysis, mineral components and pore types of carbonate rocks were estimated, creating a basis for carbonate classification and grouping samples into different petrophysical classes. Zoning, mineral identification and porosity estimation were then conducted based on the combination of different standart log curves, including Gamma Ray (GR), Photoelectric factor (PEF), Neutron porosity (NPHI), Density (RHOB) and Sonic (DT). In well RR02, carbonate reservoir was mostly made up by limestone and could be divided into two zones with lower zone affected by dolomitization with higher porosity. Four types of rock fabrics were diagnosed along nearly 90m-thick carbonate reservoir, namely, grainstone, grain-dominated packstone, wackstone and boundstone. Two main pore types were found corresponding to each identified carbonate fabric, including interparticle and vuggy pores estimated in range of 5.9% to 10% and 2.9% – 21.5%, respectively

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900934
2019-06-03
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Burke, J.A., Campbell, R.L., & A.W.Schmidt
    . (1969). The Litho-Porosity Cross Plot - A Method of Determining Rock Characteristics for Computation of Log Data. SPWLA Tenth Annual Logging Symposium.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bust, V.K., Oletu, J.U., & Worthington, P.F.
    (2011). The Challenges for Carbonate Petrophysics in Petroleum Resource Estimation Society of Petroleum Engineers, 14(01), 25–34. doi: 10.2118/142819‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/142819-PA [Google Scholar]
  3. Cluff, R., Cluff, S., Sharma, R., & Sutton, C.
    (2015). A Deterministic Lithology Model for the Green River-Upper Wasatch Interval of the Uinta Basin. Paper presented at the AAPG Annual Conventional & Exhibition2015, Denver, Colorado.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Choquette, P.W., & Pray, L.C.
    (1970). Geologic Nomenclature and Classification of Porosity in Sedimentary Carbonate. AAPG, 54, 207–251.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Folk, R.L.
    (1962). Spectral subdivision of Limestone types. AAPG, Memoir (1), 62–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lucia, F.J.
    (1983). Petrophysical Parameters Estimated From Visual Descriptions of Carbonate Rocks: A Field Classification of Carbonate Pore Space. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 35(03), 629–637. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/10073-PA
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1995). Rock-Fabric/Petrophysical Classification of Carbonate Pore Space for Reservoir Characterization. AAPG Bulletin, 79(9), 1275–1300. doi:10.1306/7834D4A4-1721-11D7-8645000102C1865D
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2007). Carbonate Reservoir Characterization - An Integrated approach, 2nd Ed., p.342, Texas, Springer. ISBN: 978-3-540-72740-8
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900934
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900934
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error