1887

Abstract

Summary

Pore pressure prediction of shale gas reservoir is essential for reserves evaluation and drilling-related geohazard prevention. For young shale sediments, P-velocity has direct correlation association with effective stress (overburden stress minus pore pressure). Trend methods, such as Eaton's method and Flemings’ method, have been widely used and have achieved reliable and accurate results. For old shale gas reservoir, such as the Paleozoic marine shale in South China, effective stress is not the only direct factor affecting P-velocity. To achieve a suitable prediction for old shale reservoir, we first use modified Eaton's method to predict pore pressure of target shale with sonic log referencing mud weight. Then, we calculate overburden stress and bulk modulus of target shale with density, P-velocity and S-velocity logs. Through cross plotting P-velocity, effective stress and bulk modulus, we find that they have a polynomial correlation association and fit them with a polynomial function. After that, we use well-log constrained seismic inversion to extract the density and P-velocity cubes. Finally, we estimate the pore pressure of target shale with the fitted polynomial function and seismically inverted P-velocity and density. The result shows the estimated pore pressure gradient of the target shale is consistent with the log-derived values.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900945
2019-06-03
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Eaton, B.A.
    [1975]. The equation for geopressure prediction from well logs, SPE 5544.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Flemings, P.B., Stump, B.B., Finkbeiner, T. and Zoback, M.
    [2002]. Flow focusing in overpressured sandstones: Theory, observations, and applications. American Journal of Science, 302(10), 827–855.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Guo, T.L.
    [2015]. The Fuling Shale Gas Field - A highly productive Silurian gas shale with high thermal maturity and complex evolution history, southeastern Sichuan Basin, China. Interpretation-a Journal of Subsurface Characterization, 3(2), Sj25–Sj34.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Sayers, C.M., Johnson, G.M. and Denyer, G.
    [2002]. Predrill pore-pressure prediction using seismic data. Geophysics, 67(4), 1286–1292.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Tingay, M.R.P., Hillis, R.R., Swarbrick, R.E., Morley, C.K. and Damit, A.R.
    [2009]. Origin of overpressure and pore-pressure prediction in the Baram province, Brunei. AAPG Bulletin, 93(1), 51–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Yale, D.P., Perez, A. and Raney, R.
    [2018]. Novel pore pressure prediction technique for unconventional reservoirs. In Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, J.C.
    [2011]. Pore pressure prediction from well logs: Methods, modifications, and new approaches. Earth-Science Reviews, 108(1–2), 50–63.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900945
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900945
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error