1887

Abstract

Summary

Some monitoring contexts place significant constraints on surface access for field operations: reducing surface footprint is a common priority for CO2 projects, for example. Less intrusive downhole methods may be preferred. Of possible downhole techniques, pressure monitoring has the advantage of accessing the saturation/permeability/porosity distribution most directly, as opposed to inferences from elastic impedances (seismic) or resistivity (electrical). A suite of controlled well tests observed at multiple wells can be used to monitor plume location via an inversion framework we call “pressure tomography”. Preprocessing the data to remove environmental signals such as barometric pressure and earth tides is crucial. Computational methods for inverting the processed data based on both nonlinear adjoint theory and low-dimensional object-based models have been developed. The information-destructive nature of the forward physics, where gas strongly buffers the pressure, can be partially compensated for by use of Bayesian priors that promote strongly contiguous plume reconstructions. Prototype inversion studies based on the Stage 3 injection program of the CO2CRC Otway project indicate that plume imaging is workable for well arrays that adequately illuminate the plume. Conversely, large uncertainties appear if parts of the plume are remote from or poorly illumined by the testing array.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900952
2019-06-03
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cao, Y., Li, S., Petzold, L. and Serban, R.
    [2003] Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis for Differential-Algebraic Equations: The Adjoint DAE System and Its Numerical Solution. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 24(3), 1076–1089.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ennis-King, J., Gunning, J., LaForce, T., Paterson, L. and Jenkins, C.
    [2018] Time–lapse cross–well pressure tomography for monitoring CO2 plumes and detecting leaks: efficient approaches to inversion. In: Proc. 14th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference, Melbourne.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Grader, A.S. and Horne, R.N.
    [1988] Interference Testing: Detecting a Circular Impermeable or Compressible Subregion. SPE Formation Evaluation.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hu, L., Bayer, P., Alt-Epping, P., Tatomir, A., Sauter, M. and Brauchler, R.
    [2015] Time-lapse pressure tomography for characterizing CO2 plume evolution in a deep saline aquifer. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 39, 91–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Oliver, D.S., Liu, Ning, and Reynolds, A.C.
    [2008] Inverse theory for petroleum reservoir characterization and history matching. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Virieux, J. and Operto, S.
    [2009] An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics, 74(6), WCC1–WCC26.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900952
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900952
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error