1887

Abstract

Summary

Conventional reverse time migration obtains the final image via simply stacking single-shot imaging result. Many factors such as the inaccurate migration velocity, the mad physics assumption and the imperfection sampling, cause the misalignment, amplitude difference and artifacts in different trace on the shot-index gathers. Mean stacking reduces the imaging quality. In the abstract, we propose a weighted stacking to improve the imaging quality. First, we apply the dynamic time warping method to correct the uneven shot gathers. The dynamic time warping is a nonlinear aligning method that effectively correct the residual misalignment on the shot gathers. Then, we use the local similarity to construct the weighted coefficient on the foundation of the flat shot gathers. The local similarity method can better estimate the correlation between different traces. Finally, we present results on synthetic and real data to illustrate our approach is valid.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900667
2019-06-03
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Albertin, Uwe, and LinbinZhang
    . “Migration optimization through local phase alignment of partial migration images.”SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2014. 3769–3773.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, K., and J.Gaby
    , 1983, Dynamic waveform matching: Information Sciences [J], 31, 221–242.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Biondi, B., and P.Sava
    , 1999, Wave equation migration velocity analysis: 69th Annual International
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Etgen, John T., et al.
    “Adaptive image focusing.”SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2014. 3774–3778.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Feng, Bo, HuazhongWang, and Ru-ShanWu
    . “Automatic traveltime inversion via sparse decomposition of seismic data.”Geophysics83.6 (2018): R659–R668.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fomel, S.
    , 2007a, Shaping regularization in geophysical-estimation problems :Geophysics, 72, no. 2, R29–R36.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , 2007b, Local seismic attributes: Geophysics, 72, no. 3, A29–A33.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hale, Dave
    . “Dynamic warping of seismic images.”Geophysics78.2 (2013): S105–S115.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Jones, Ian F., MarcinKobylarski, and JohnBrittan
    . “RTM Imaging Conditions and Image Enhancement via Optical Stacking.”78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016. 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jones, Ian, MarcinKobylarski, and JohnBrittan
    . “Tutorial: RTM image enhancement; bad models and mad physics.”First Break35.3 (2017): 31–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lailly, P.
    , 1983, The seismic inverse problems as a sequence of before stack migrations: Conference on inverse scatterring: Theory and application: SIAM.Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1723–1726.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Roberts, Mark
    . “Focusing long-and short-wavelength velocity errors with RTM.”SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2017. 4666–4670.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Stork, C.
    , 1992, Reflection tomography in the postmigrated domain : Geophysics, 57, 680–692.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Tarantola, A.
    , 1984, Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation: Geophysics, 49, 1259–1266.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Wu, C., and H.Wang
    . “Nonlinear Optimal Stacking for Enhancing Pre-Stack Seismic Data.”80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2018. 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900667
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900667
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error