1887

Abstract

Summary

Least-squares migration can, in theory, reduce the acquisition footprint and improve the illumination of the subsurface structures. However, in complex subsurface structures, rays or the wave energy will penetrate poorly in some regions, e.g., subsalt region, and that region will be a shadow zone to a typical surface seismic acquisition. The shadow zone is in the null space of the migration operator and the subsurface information in that region will not be recovered even by posing imaging as an inverse problem. To rectify this, we use another set of data, along with surface seismic dataset, whose ray paths are different from the surface seismic. Seismic-while-drilling (SWD) dataset are complementary to surface data, and it brings an opportunity to address seismic illumination issue by adding new measurements into the imaging problem. Accordingly, in this research, we formulate the joint least-squares reverse time migration of surface seismic and SWD datasets and explore its potential in imaging the parts of the model that is in the shadow zone of the surface seismic acquisition. Presented results on the BP-Model94 show that the joint least-squares migration outperforms the single surface and single SWD least-squares migrations in improving the illumination of subsurface structures.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900697
2019-06-03
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baysal, E., Kosloff, D.D. and Sherwood, J.W.
    [1983] Reverse time migration. Geophysics, 48(11), 1514–1524.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, K. and Sacchi, M.D.
    [2017] Elastic least-squares reverse time migration via linearized elastic full-waveform inversion with pseudo-Hessian preconditioning. Geophysics, 82(5), S341–S358.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Clapp, M.L., Clapp, R.G. and Biondi, B.L.
    [2005] Regularized least-squares inversion for 3-D subsalt imaging. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2005, Society of Exploration Geophysi-cists, 1814–1817.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ji, J.
    [2009] An exact adjoint operation pair in time extrapolation and its application in least-squares reverse-time migration. Geophysics, 74(5), H27–H33.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kazemi, N. and Sacchi, M.D.
    [2014] Sparse multichannel blind deconvolution. Geophysics, 79(5), V143–V152.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. [2015] Block row recursive least-squares migration. Geophysics, 80(5), A95–A101.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kazemi, N., Shor, R. and Innanen, K.
    [2018] Illumination Compensation with Seismic-While-Drilling Plus Surface Seismic Imaging. In: 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2018. doi:10.3997/2214‑4609.201800882.
    https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201800882 [Google Scholar]
  8. Kuhl, H. and Sacchi, M.D.
    [2003] Least-squares wave-equation migration for AVP/AVA inversion. Geophysics, 68, 262–273.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Levin, S.A.
    [1984] Principle of reverse-time migration. Geophysics, 49(5), 581–583.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Loewenthal, D. and Mufti, I.R.
    [1983] Reversed time migration in spatial frequency domain. Geophysics, 48(5), 627–635.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Nemeth, T., Wu, C. and Schuster, G.T.
    [1999] Least-squares migration of incomplete reflection data. Geophysics, 64(1), 208–221.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Poletto, F.
    [2005] Energy balance of a drill-bit seismic source, part 1: Rotary energy and radiation properties. Geophysics, 70(2), T13–T28.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tarantola, A.
    [1984] Linearized inversion of seismic reflection data. Geophysical prospecting, 32(6), 998–1015.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Trad, D.
    [2015] Least squares Kirchhoff depth migration: Implementation, challenges, and opportunities. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2015, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 4238–4242.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Xue, Z., Chen, Y., Fomel, S. and Sun, J.
    [2015] Seismic imaging of incomplete data and simultaneous-source data using least-squares reverse time migration with shaping regularization. Geophysics, 81(1), S11–S20.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lou, M.
    [2006]. Traveltime calculation in 3D TTI media by the fast marching method, 68th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Expanded Abstract. H035.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lou, M., Cheng, D. and Doherty, F.
    [2009]. Two processing options for suppressing VSP migration artifacts and noise. 71st EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Expanded Abstract. T033.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhao, X.M.
    [2015]. VSP Kirchhoff migration with structure constraint. 77th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Expanded Abstract. P2-09
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900697
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900697
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error