1887

Abstract

Summary

Since production-induced stress changes in the reservoir lead to deformation and velocity variations in the overburden, understanding the geomechanical behaviour of the caprock has become important for reservoir characterisation. We utilise a semi-analytical Geertsma approach that linearly relates subsurface displacements to geomechanical compacting reservoirs, to invert for reservoir pressure changes from 4D time-strains measured within the overburden shales (Heather, Kimmeridge Clay and Kromer Knoll Gr.) from the Shearwater Field. This solution aims to recover average R-factors from a scaling process where the inverted pressure and the pressure from the simulator predictions are statistically analysed. We validate the technique by generating multiple simulations for several ranges of mechanical properties and forward modelling the inversion results; we found that average R-factor of 4–5 for the shales closely matches both distributions of pressure change. We also demonstrate that the R-values recovered from this method are a function of mechanical properties and lithology, which have significant impact on the computation of realistic time-shift from predicted vertical strain. The inversion method has shown to be an adequate analytical approach for strain and pressure modelling of the reservoir and overburden caprock at Shearwater, improving the current understanding of how shales deformation occur in geomechanically active reservoirs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901150
2019-06-03
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hatchell, P. and Bourne, S.
    [2005] Measuring reservoir compaction using time-lapse timeshifts, 75th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hodgson, N., MacBeth, C., Duranti, L., Rickett, J., and Nihei, K.
    [2007] Inverting for reservoir pressure change using time strain: Genesis Field Gulf of Mexico. The Leading Edge, 26:649.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Jones, D., Taylor, B., Gill, C., Bevaart, M., van Bergen, P.
    , [2018] Understanding the overburden above a HPHT field. Petroleum Geology (Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 429–3). Geol. Society of London.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Landrø, M., & Stammeijer, J.
    [2004] Quantitative estimation of compaction and velocity changes using 4D impedance and traveltime changes. Geophysics, 69(4), 949–957.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. MacBeth, C., Mangriotis, M. D., & Amini, H.
    [2018] An interpretation and evaluation of 4D time shifts. In TPE Abstracts 2018 (pp. 5308–5312). Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Røste, T., Stovas, A., & Landrø, M.
    [2006] Estimation of layer thickness and velocity changes using 4D prestack seismic data. Geophysics, 71(6), S219–S234.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Segall, P.
    [1992] Stresses due to fluid extraction from axisymmetric reservoirs. Geophysics, 139(3):535–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Wong, M. and MacBeth, C.
    [2016]. R-factor Recovery via Geertsma's Pressure Inversion Assisted by Engineering Concepts. 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016-Workshops.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901150
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901150
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error