1887

Abstract

Summary

We present an in-depth study performed in the Jubarte's reservoir (Campos Basin, Brazil) to demonstrate that marine CSEM could complement seismic in reservoir-monitoring applications.

We show that 4D CSEM could play an important role in improving our knowledge of reservoir structure and properties. What lies beyond its adoption is its perceived value and cost relative to seismic, lack of definitive case studies and most significant, lack of game-changing developments and investments in new concept 4D acquisition systems.

We conclude that transformation of marine CSEM into an accepted and cost-efficient integrator to 4D seismic requires major technological enhancements reassessing instrument design, resolution and deployment to operational efficiency.

As demands for deep-water reservoir monitoring become more challenging, seismic – EM ocean bottom technology could increase the confidence in 4D and the rock physics behind it. Planning for 4D integrated seismic -EM early in the field's life may help minimize the number of initial development wells and permit early field intervention and upgrades to the depletion and reservoir-management strategies.

In the current capital constrained market, development funding for 4D seismic – EM game-changing technologies waiting to happen, could be difficult to secure. But we are optimistic as we foresee the potential and needs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901154
2019-06-03
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Combee, L., and Zerilli, A.
    , 2012. Electromagnetic source to produce multiple electromagnetic components. US Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No. US 2012/0194196 A1, Aug.2, 2012, Appl. No. 13/019,599.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Jonhston, D.H.
    , 2013. Practical Application of Time-Lapse Seismic Data. SEG 2013 Distinguished Instructor Short Course, Distinguished Instructor Series no. 16, 270 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lewis, B., Stone, J., Northall, J., Brooks, C. and Manning, T.
    , 2016. Taking ocean-bottom seismic to the next level with efficient acquisition. 78th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, Tu STZ0 04.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ramos Filho, W.L, Dariva, P., Born, C.C., Zorzanelli, I.B., Goertz, A. and Smith, A.
    , 2017. Permanent Reservoir Monitoring at Jubarte Field – 4D Results and Reservoir Characterization. First EAGE Workshop on Practical Reservoir Monitoring, 6–9 March, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Zerilli, A., Buonora, M.P., Labruzzo, T.
    , 2011. Enhancing the resolution of mCSEM data using a hybrid-based inversion workflow. European Association of Geophysical Engineers, 73rd Conference & Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, 23–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Zerilli, A., Labruzzo, T., Marçal, A.A., Andreasi, F.G., Buonora, M.P., Alvim, L.M., Johann, P.R.S., Crepaldi, J.L.S.
    , 2016. Schlumberger-Petrobras Technology Cooperation Agreement; Subproject: Next generation deep reading electromagnetic (EM) technologies for reservoir appraisal and monitoring and integrated basin scale geological research. Technology development Phase 4.a: Guidelines Marine Electromagnetics for Reservoir Appraisal and Monitoring. Final Report Vol. 1.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901154
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901154
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error