1887

Abstract

Summary

Sparse deconvolution methods frequently invert for subsurface reflection impulses and adopt a trace-by-trace processing pattern. However, following this approach causes unreliability of the estimated reflectivity due to the nonuniqueness of the inverse problem, the poor spatial continuity of structures in the reconstructed reflectivity section, and the suppression on the reflection signals with small amplitudes. We have developed a structurally constrained multichannel deconvolution (SCMD) algorithm to alleviate these three issues. The algorithm inverts for a high-resolution seismogram rather than the full-band reflectivity series, thereby reducing the multiple solutions in the inversion and enhancing the reliability of processing results. We also exploited a structural constraint term to guarantee the spatial continuity of the structures, and we enhanced the relatively weak signals. The reflection structure characteristics are the core of the structural regularization item. We solved the cost function of the SCMD by the alternating direction method of multipliers algorithm. Synthetic model and field data examples demonstrate the rationality of SCMD and confirmed that the algorithm can provide a better inversion result than the conventional sparse spike inversion in terms of retrieving weak reflection events and guaranteeing stratal continuities.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901202
2019-06-03
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berkhout, A. J.
    [1977] Least-squares inverse filtering and wavelet deconvolution. Geophysics, 42(7), 1369–1383.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang, R., and J.Castagna
    . [2011] Seismic sparse-layer reflectivity inversion using basis pursuit decomposition. Geophysics, 76(6), R147–R158.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ooe, M., and T. J.Ulrych
    . [1979] Minimum entropy deconvolution with an exponential transformation. Geophysical Prospecting, 27(2), 458–473.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ulrych, T. Z., M. D.Sacchi, and A.Woodbury
    . [2001] A Bayes tour of inversion: A tutorial. Geophysics, 66(1), 55–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gholami, A., and M. D.Sacchi
    . [2013] Fast 3D blind seismic deconvolution via constrained total variation and GCV. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 6(4), 2350–2369.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Clapp, R. G., B.Biondi, and J. F.Claerbout
    . [2004] Incorporating geologic information into reflection tomography. Geophysics, 69(2), 533–546.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hamid, H., and A.Pidlisecky.
    [2016] Structurally constrained impedance inversion. Interpretation, 4(4), T577–T589.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901202
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901202
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error