Reducing Cost of Geothermal and Petroleum Explorations with Invariants

References

1. Alvarez, O., Gimenez, M. E., Martinez, M. P., Klinger, F. L., and Braitenberg, C.
   [2015]. New insights into the Andean crustal structure between 32 and 34 S from GOCE satellite gravity data and EGM2008 model. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 399(1), 183–202.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Álvarez, O., Pesce, A., Gimenez, M., Folguera, A., Soler, S., and Chen, W.
   [2017]. Analysis of the Illapel Mw= 8.3 Thrust Earthquake Rupture Zone Using GOCE-Derived Gradients. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 1–29.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bektaş, Ö., Ravat, D., Büyüksaraç, A., Bilim, F., and Ateş, A.
   [2007]. Regional geothermal characterisation of East Anatolia from aeromagnetic, heat flow and gravity data. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 164(5), 975–998
   [Google Scholar]
4. Braitenberg, C, Wienecke, S., and Wang, Y.
   [2006]. Basement structures from satellite-derived gravity field: South China Sea ridge. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 111(B5).
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bonvalot, S., Balmino, G., Briais, A., M.Kuhn, Peyrefitte, A., ValesN., Biancale, R., Gabalda, G., Reinquin, F., Sarrailh, M.
   [2012]. World Gravity Map. Commission for the Geological Map of the World. Eds. BGI-CGMW-CNES-IRD, Paris.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ebbing, J., Bouman, J., Fuchs, M., Lieb, V., Haagmans, R., Meekes, J. A. C., and Fattah, R. A.
   [2013]. Advancements in satellite gravity gradient data for crustal studies. The Leading Edge, 32(8), 900–906.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Fuchs, M. J., Bouman, J., Broerse, T., Visser, P., & Vermeersen, B.
   [2013]. Observing coseismic gravity change from the Japan Tohoku- Oki 2011 earthquake with GOCE gravity gradiometry. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 118(10), 5712–5721.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Grombein, T., Seitz, K., and Heck, B.
   [2014]. Topographic-isostatic reduction of GOCE gravity gradients. In Earth on the Edge: Science for a Sustainable Planet (pp. 349–356). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   [Google Scholar]
9. HirtC., GruberT., FeatherstoneW.E.
   [2011]. Evaluation of the first GOCE static gravity field models using terrestrial gravity, vertical deflections and EGM2008 quasigeoid heights. J Geod85:723–740. doi: 10.1007/s00190‑011‑0482‑y.
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0482-y [Google Scholar]
10. Featherstone, W. E., Kirby, J. F., Hirt, C., Filmer, M. S., Claessens, S. J., Brown, N. J., ... and Johnston, G. M.
    [2011]. The AUSGeoid09 model of the Australian height datum. Journal of Geodesy, 85(3), 133–150.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Murphy, C. A., and Dickinson, J. L.
    [2009]. Geological mapping and targeting using invariant tensor analysis on full tensor gravity data. In EGM 2010 International Workshop.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Okan, Y.
    [2013]. Panel Discussion An Outlook For Gas Supply In The Black Sea Region by 2020, presentation, unpublished. URL: http://e-wiki.org/tr/images/1926_ankara_antla%C5%9Fmas%C4%B1#images-2.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Yildiz, H., Forsberg, R., Ågren, J., Tscherning, C., and Sjöberg, L.
    [2012]. Comparison of remove-compute-restore and least squares modification of Stokes' formula techniques to quasi-geoid determination over the Auvergne test area. Journal of Geodetic Science, 2(1), 53–64.
    [Google Scholar]