1887

Abstract

Summary

Fundamental and incremental changes in both the technology and methodologies used in imaging are transforming the way we undertake processing and imaging projects. The drivers for this change includes factors internal to the hydrocarbon exploration and production (E&P) industry (for example - the oil price and the increasing commoditisation of, particularly, the processing part of projects) and factors driven by the outside world (for example - the pace of computer development, both in hardware and software and the rise of cloud-based systems).

In this paper we will look at how the future of seismic imaging is likely to be dominated by the influence of fundamental changes to the way we build models and images of the subsurface and the merging of these two end goals of a traditional imaging project. Amongst the relevant technologies we will discuss are full waveform inversion (FWI) and the goal of high-frequency interpretable models, reflection full waveform inversion and/or reconstructed wavefield inversion (RFWI), Least-squares reverse-time migration (RTM) and the ultimate goal of closed-loop solutions. We illustrate these changes with examples from recent imaging projects in areas of complex geology.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901268
2019-06-03
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Fletcher, R.P., Nichols, D., Bloor, R. and Coates, R. T.
    , [2016]. Least-squares migration – Data domain versus image domain using point-spread functions. The Leading Edge, 35 (2), 157–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Guitton, A.
    , [2004]. Amplitude and kinematic corrections of migrated images for nonunitary imaging operators. Geophysics, 69, 1017–1024.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Jones, I.F., Singh, J., Cox, P., Warner, M., Hawke, C., Harger, D., Greenwood, S.
    , [2018], High resolution velocity estimation using refraction and reflection FWI: the Fortuna region, offshore Equatorial Guinea. EAGE-PESGB workshop on velocities, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. van Leeuwen, T., and Hermann, F.
    , [2013]. Mitigating local minima in full-waveform inversion by expanding the search space. Geophysical Journal International, 195, 661–667,
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Verschuur, D.J. and Berkhout, A.J.
    , [2015]. From removing to using multiples in closed-loop imaging. The Leading Edge, 34 (7), 744–759.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang, C., Yingst, D., Farmer, P., Jones, I., Martin, G. and Leveille, J.
    , [2017a]. Reconstructed full-waveform inversion with the extended source. Expanded Abstracts for the 87th SEG Meeting, FWI5.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , [2017b]. Reconstructed wavefield imaging with the extended source. Expanded Abstracts for the 87th SEG Meeting, SPMI E-P1.3.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, Y., Ratcliffe, A., Roberts, G. and Dian, L.
    , [2014]. Amplitude-preserving reverse time migration: from reflectivity to velocity and impedance inversion. Geophysics, 79 (6), S271-S283.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901268
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901268
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error