1887
  1. Home
  2. Conferences
  3. Conference Proceedings
  4. 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019
  5. Conference paper

Abstract

Summary

Anisotropy is one of the important factors that affects the response of electromagnetic resistivity logging while drilling. For real-time inversion and fast reconstruction of formation true resistivity, the forward modeling of electromagnetic resistivity logging while drilling is usually based on the transversely isotropic formation model with vertical symmetry axis (VTI medium), but it only considers the horizontal and vertical resistivity. It has certain limitation during the realistic application. In this paper, a forward calculation method of electromagnetic resistivity logging while drilling in TTI strata is presented. The proposed algorithm is verified by numerical examples. Numerical simulation shows that there exist critical relative borehole dip and critical anisotropy dip angles in TTI formation. Electromagnetic resistivity logging while drilling responses follows different rule before and after these two these two critical angles.

© EAGE Publications BV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901656
2019-06-03
2024-04-24

  • From This Site

    /content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901656
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. B.I.Anderson, T.D.Barber and S.C.Gianzero
    . [2001] The effect of crossbedding anisotropy on induction tool response. Petrophysics, vol. 42, no. 2, pp.137–149.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. D.Pardo, and C.Torres-Verdín
    . [2015] Fast 1D inversion of logging-while-drilling resistivity measurements for improved estimation of formation resistivity in high-angle and horizontal wells. Geophysics, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. E111–E124.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. G.Merchant, R.Strickland and C.Jackson
    . [1996] Enhanced resolution LWD resistivity logs using a new inversion technique. Presented at Trans. SPWLA 37th Annu. Logging Symp., New Orleans, Louisiana.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. G.Wang, T.Barber, P.Wu, D.Allen, and A.Abubakar
    . [2014] Triaxial induction tool response in dipping and crossbedded formations. Presented at SEG Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. G.Wang, T.Barber, P.Wu, D.Allen and A.Abubakar
    . [2015] A New Model for Understanding Triaxial Induction Response in Dipping Crossbedded Formations. Presented at 56th SPWLA Annu. Logging Symp., Long Beach, California.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. K.Sun, C.Morriss, J.Rasmus, K.Ito, S.Asif, R.Griffiths, and A.Abubakar
    . [2014] Automated resistivity inversion for efficient formation evaluation in high-angle and horizontal wells. Presented at Trans. SPWLA 55th Annu. Logging Symp., Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. W. H.Meyer
    . [1993] Inversion of 2MHz propagation resistivity logs in dipping thin beds. Presented at Trans. SPWLA 34th Annu. Logging Symp.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. X.Hu and Y.Fan
    . [2018] Huber inversion for logging-while-drilling resistivity measurements in high angle and horizontal wells. Geophysics, vol. 83, no.4, pp. D113–D125.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901656
Loading
Logging While Drilling Resistivity Responses in TTI Formation
Conference Proceedings 2019, 1 (2019); https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201901656
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901656
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201901656
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error