1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Near Surface Geophysics
  4. Volume 17, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 17, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1569-4445
  • E-ISSN: 1873-0604

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Alcatraz Island National Historic Landmark is best known as a former high‐security federal penitentiary that once housed many of the United States most notorious gangsters. Today, it is a popular tourist destination adjacent to the Golden Gate Bridge in scenic San Francisco Bay. Alcatraz is less known in its former military role as a 19th‐century coastal fortification protecting the interests of a rapidly westward‐expanding nation during the turbulent era of Manifest Destiny, the 1849 Gold Rush and the Civil War. The fortification, with its underground ammunition magazines and tunnels, is important from a military history perspective, marking the transition to earthen structures from the traditional brick and masonry constructions that characterized earlier 19th‐century coastal defences. In this paper, geophysical interpretations based upon an attribute analysis of ground‐penetrating radar data are combined with terrestrial laser scans, georectifications based on historical documents, maps and photographs to develop an iterative model for locating and determining the extent and integrity of subsurface historical architectural remains beneath the former recreation yard of the Alcatraz penitentiary. Using this approach, remnants of buried structures including a ‘bombproof’ earthwork and its underlying vaulted brick masonry tunnel and ventilation ducts were discovered to run east‐west beneath the recreation yard. This integrative and iterative process permits accurate spatial identification of these and other 19th‐century architectural structures depicted in historical documents. This approach can be applied to subsurface investigations at other important cultural landmarks worldwide.

© 2019 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2019 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12031
2019-01-29
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12031
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AbramsJ.J.2012. Alcatraz. Warner Bros. Television.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Al‐khederS., Al‐shawabkhY. and HaalaN.2009. Developing a documentation system for desert palaces in Jordan using 3D laser scanning and digital photogrammetry. Journal of Archaeological Science36, 537–546.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. AltunasC., YildizF. and ScaioniM.2016. Laser scanning and data integration for three‐dimensional digital recording of complex historical structures: The case of Mevlana Museum. International Journal of Geo‐Information5, 18.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. BarrowJ.D. and BhavsarS.P.1987. Filaments‐what the astronomer's eye tells the astronomer's brain. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society28, 109–128.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. BayM.1996. The Rock. Hollywood Pictures.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. BönigerU. and TronickeJ.2010a. Improving the interpretability of 3D GPT data using target specific attributes: application to tomb detection. Journal of Archaeological Science37, 360–367.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. BönigerU. and TronickeJ.2010b. Integrated data analysis at an archaeological site: a case study using 3D GPR, magnetic, and high‐resolution topographic data. Geophysics75, B169–B176.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. CampbellB.J.1964. Escape from Alcatraz: A Farewell to the Rock. Ballantine Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. CastellazziG., D'AltriA.M., BitelliG., SelvaggiI. and LambertiniA.2015. From laser scanning to finite element analysis of complex building by using a semi‐automated procedure. Sensors15, 18360–18380.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. CLR
    CLR . 2010. Alcatraz Island National Historic Landmark: Cultural Landscape Report. Mundus Bishop.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. ConstanzoA., MinasiM., CasulaG., MusacchioM. and BuongiornoM.F.2015. Combined use of terrestrial laser scanning and IR thermography applied to a historical building. Sensors15, 194–213.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. ConyersL.B.2012. Interpreting Ground‐Penetrating Radar for Archaeology. Left Coast Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. ConyersL.B.2013. Ground‐Penetrating Radar for Archaeology, 3rd edn. AltaMira.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. ConyersL.B.2015. Analysis and interpretation of GPR datasets for integrated archaeological mapping. Near Surface Geophysics13, 645–651.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. ConyersL.B.2016. Ground‐Penetrating Radar for Geoarchaeology. John Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. ConyersL.B. and LeckebuschJ.2010. Geophysical archaeology research agendas for the future: some ground‐penetrating radar examples. Archaeological Prospection17, 117–123.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. CreasmanP.P., SassenD., KoepnickS., DoyleN.2010. Ground‐penetrating radar survey at the pyramid complex of Senwosret III at Dahshur, Egypt, 2008: search for the lost boat of a Pharaoh. Journal of Archaeological Science37, 516–524.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. DomingoI., VillaverdeV., López‐MontalvoE., LermaJ.L. and CabrellesM.2013. Latest developments in rock art recording: towards an integral documentation of Levantine rock art sites combining 2D and 3D recording techniques. Journal of Archaeological Science40, 1879–1889.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. El‐HakimS., GonzoL., VoltoliniF., GirardiS., RizziA., RemondinoF.et al. 2007. Detailed 3D modelling of castles. International Journal of Architectural Computing5, 119–220.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. EntwistleJ.A., MCCaffreyK.J.W. and AbrahamsP.W.2009. Three‐dimensional (3D) visualization: the application of terrestrial laser scanning in the investigation of historic Scottish farming townships. Journal of Archaeological Science36, 860–866.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. FieldR.2011. Forts of the American Frontier, 1776–1891: California, Oregon, Washington, and Alaska. Osprey Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. FloydD.E.2010. Coastal defenses. In: A Companion to American military History (ed. J.C.Bradford ), pp. 662–680. Blackwell Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. ForteE., PipanM., CasabiancaD., Di CuiaR. and RivaA.2012. Imaging and characterization of a carbonate hydrocarbon reservoir analogue using GPR attributes. Journal of Applied Geophysics81, 76–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. FrankenheimerJ.1962. Birdman of Alcatraz. United Artists.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. GoodmanD. and PiroS.2013. GPR Remote Sensing in Archaeology. Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. HakonenA., KuuselaJ.‐M. and OkkonenJ.2015. Assessing the application of laser scanning and 3D inspection in the study of prehistoric cairn sites: the case study of Tahkokangas, Northern Finland. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports2, 227–234
     [Google Scholar]
  27. HargraveM.L.2006. Ground truthing the results of geophysical surveys. In: Remote Sensing in Archaeology: An Explicitly North American Perspective (ed. J.K.Johnson ), pp. 269–304. The University of Alabama Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. JacobR.W. and UrbanT.M.2015. Ground‐penetrating radar velocity determination and precision estimates using common‐midpoint (CMP) collection with hand‐picking, semblance analysis and cross‐correlation analysis: a case study and tutorial for archaeologists. Archaeometry58, 987–1002.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. JakličA., EričM., MihajlovićI., StopinšekŽ. and SolinaF.2015. Volumetric models from 3D point clouds: the case study of sarcophagi cargo from a 2nd/3rd century AD Roman shipwreck near Sutivan on island Brač, Croatia. Journal of Archaeological Science62, 143–152.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. JolH.M.
    (ed.). 2009. Ground Penetrating Radar: Theory and Applications. Elsevier Science.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. KaufmannJ.E. and KaufmannH.W.2005. Fortress America: The Forts that Defended America, 1600 to the Present. Da Capo Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. KhwanmuangW. and UdphuayS.2012. Ground‐penetrating radar attribute analysis for visualization of subsurface archaeological structures. The Leading Edge31, 946–949.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. KonstamA.2003. American Civil War Fortifications (1): Costal Brick and Stone Forts . Osprey Publishing.
  34. LeckebuschJ.2003. Ground‐penetrating radar: a modern three‐dimensional prospection method. Archaeological Prospection10, 213–240.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. LooT. and StrangeC.2000. “Rock prison of liberation”: Alcatraz island and the American imagination. Radical History Review78, 27–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. LubowieckaI., AriasP., RiveiroB., SollaM.2011. Multidisciplinary approach to the assessment of historical structures based on the case of a masonry bridge in Galicia (Spain). Computers and Structures89, 1615–1627.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. LubowieckaI., ArmestoJ., AriasP. and LorenzoH.2009. Historic bridge modelling using laser scanning, ground penetrating radar and finite element methods in the context of structural dynamics. Engineering Structures31, 2667–2676.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. MacDonaldD. and NadelI.2012. Alcatraz: History and Design of a Landmark. Chronicle Books, San Francisco, CA.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. MartiniJ.A.2004. Fortress Alcatraz: Guardian of the Golden Gate. Ten Speed Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. NeubauerW., Eder‐HinterleitnerA., SerenS. and MelicharP.2002. Georadar in the Roman civil town Carnuntum, Austria: an approach for archaeological interpretation of GPR data. Archaeological Prospection9, 135–156.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. NeubauerW., GuglC., ScholzM., VerhoevenG., TrinksI., LöckerK.et al. 2014. The discovery of the school of gladiators at Carnuntum, Austria. Antiquity88, 173–190.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. NúñezMro., BuillF. and EdoM.2013. 3D model of the Sadurní cave. Journal of Archaeological Science40, 4420–4428.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. PavlidisG., TsiafakisD., TsioukasV., KoutsoudisA., ArnaoutoglouF.et al. 2007. Preservation of architectural heritage through 3D digitization. International Journal of Architectural Computing2, 221–236.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Pérez‐GrarciaV., CasellesJ.O., ClapésJ., MartinezG. and OsorioR.2013. Non‐destructive analysis in cultural heritage building: Evaluating the Mallorca cathedral supporting structures. NDT & E International59, 40–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. PlissonH. and ZotkinaL.V.2015. From 2D to 3D at macro‐ and microscopic scale in rock art studies. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage2, 102–119.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. RanieriG., GodioA., LoddoF., StoccoS., CasasA., CapizziP.et al. 2016. Geophysical prospection of the roman city of pollentia, alcúdia (Mallorca, baleric island, spain). Journal of Applied Geophysics134, 125–135.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. RogersM.B.2014. Visualizing an integrated landscape using archaeogeophysical and 3D laser surveying. In: From West to East: Current Approaches in Medieval Archaeology (ed. S.D.Stull ), pp. 6–19. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. SaarenketoT.2009. NDT transportation. In: Ground Penetrating Radar Theory and Applications (ed. H.M.Jol ), pp. 395–444. Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Santos‐AssunçaoS., Perez‐GarciaV., CassellesO., ClapesJ. and SalinasV.2014. Assessment of complex masonry structures with GPR compared to other nondestructive testing studies. Remote Sensing6, 8220–8237.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. SiegelD.1979. Escape from Alcatraz. Paramount Pictures.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. StoltR.H.1978. Migration by Fourier transform. Geophysics43, 23–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. StrangeC. and LooT.2001. Holding the rock: the “Indianization” of Alcatraz island, 1969–1999. The Public Historian23, 55–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. TapeteD., CasagliN., LuziG., FantiR., GigliG. and LevaD.2013. Integrating radar and laser‐based remote sensing techniques for monitoring structural deformation of archaeological monuments. Journal of Archaeological Science40, 176–189.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. ThompsonE.1979. The Rock: A History of Alcatraz Island, 1847–1972 (Historic Resource Study). National Parks Service.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. UdphuayS., PaulV.L., EverettM.E. and WardenR.B.2010. Ground penetrating radar imaging of twelfth century Romanesque foundations beneath the thirteenth century Gothic Abbey Church of Valmagne, France. Archaeological Prospection17, 199–212.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. UrbanT.M., RowanY.M., KerselM.M.2014. Ground‐penetrating radar investigations at Marj Rabba, a Chalcolithic site in the lower Galilee of Israel. Journal of Archaeological Science46, 96–106.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. VerdonckL., TaelmanD., VermeulenF. and DocterR.2015. The impact of spatial sampling and migration on the interpretation of complex archaeological ground‐penetrating radar data. Archaeological Prospection22, 91–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. WardD. and KassebaumG.2009. Alcatraz: The Gangster Years. University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. WardenR., TozT.K., EverettM., de SmetT., BillingsleyA. and HaginJ.2013. Recording and analysis of the Rec yard at Alcatraz island. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XL‐5/W2, 679–684, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W2-679-2013.
  60. WattersM.S. and WilkesS.2014. Integrating 3D surface and sub‐surface data for heritagepreservation and planning. LiDAR Magazine3, 14–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. WellmanG.L.2008. A History of Alcatraz Island 1853–2008, Images of America. Arcadia Publishing, Charleston, SC.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. YangH., XuX. and NeumannI.2014. The benefits of 3D laser scanning technology in the generation and calibration of FEM models for health assessment of concrete structures. Sensors14, 21889–21904.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. YilmazO.2001. Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion, and Interpretation of Seismic Data . SEG Investigations in Geophysics No. 10, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
  64. ZhaoW., ForteE., LeviS.T., PipanM., TianG.2015b. Improved high‐resolution GPR imaging and characterization of prehistoric archaeological features by means of attribute analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science54, 77–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. ZhaoW., ForteE., PipanM., TianG.2013a. Ground penetrating radar (GPR) attribute analysis for archaeological prospection. Journal of Applied Geophysics97, 107–117.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. ZhaoW., TianG., ForteE., PipanM., WangY., LiX.et al. 2015a. Advances in GPR data acquisition and analysis for archaeology. Geophysical Journal International202, 62–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. ZhaoW., TianG., WangB., ForteE., PipanM., LinJ.et al. 2013b. 2D and 3D imaging of a buried prehistoric canoe using GPR attributes: a case study. Near Surface Geophysics11, 457–464.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. ZhaoW., TianG., WangB., Shi Zhan‐JieZ. and LinJ.2012. Application of 3D GPR attribute technology in archaeological investigations. Applied Geophysics9, 261–269.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12031
Loading
The fate of the historic fortifications at Alcatraz island based on terrestrial laser scans and ground‐penetrating radar interpretations from the recreation yard
Near Surface Geophysics 17, 151 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12031
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12031
/content/journals/10.1002/nsg.12031
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Archaeogeophysics; Ground‐penetrating radar; Terrestrial laser scanning

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error