Vertical–vertical controlled‐source electromagnetic instrumentation and acquisition

References

1. AlumbaughD., CuevasN., ChenJ., GaoG. and BradyJ.2010. Comparison of sensitivity and resolution with two marine CSEM exploration methods. SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 3893–3897.
2. AndréisD. and MacGregorL.2008. Controlled‐source electromagnetic sounding in shallow water: principles and applications. Geophysics73, F21–F32.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BarsukovP., FainbergE. and SingerB.2007. A method for hydrocarbon reservoir mapping and apparatus for use when performing the method. World patent WO2007053025.
4. ConstableS.2006. Method and system for seafloor geological survey using vertical electric field measurement. US patent 7,116,108 B2.
5. ConstableS.2013. Instrumentation for marine magnetotelluric and controlled source electromagnetic sounding. Geophysical Prospecting61, 505–532.
   [Google Scholar]
6. CoxC., DeatonP. and PistekP.1981. An active source em method for the seafloor. UC San Diego. Scripps Institution of Oceanography Technical Report, 1–32.
7. EidesmoT., EllingsrudS., MacGregorL.M., ConstableS., SinhaM.C., JohansenS., et al. 2002. Sea bed logging (SBL), a new method for remote and direct identification of hydrocarbon filled layers in deepwater areas. First Break20, 144–152.
   [Google Scholar]
8. EllingsrudS., EidesmoT., JohansenS., SinhaM., MacgregorL. and ConstableS.2002. Remote sensing of hydrocarbon layers by seabed logging (SBL): results from a cruise offshore Angola. The Leading Edge21, 972–982.
   [Google Scholar]
9. FrafjordO., EideK., El KaffasA., HelwigS. and HoltenT.2016. A 2.5D comparison between two CSEM methods: 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Expanded Abstracts.
10. FrafjordO., HoltenT., El KaffasA., BorvenJ. and HelwigS.2014. Minimizing the noise contribution in vertical electric field measurements: 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Expanded Abstracts.
11. GlouxB., HelwigS. and WoodW.2016. Apparatus for orienting an electromagnetic field sensor, and related receiver unit and method. Norwegian patent 342689.
12. GoldmanM., MogilatovV., LeviE., TezkanB. and HaroonA.2015. Signal detectability of marine electromagnetic methods in the exploration of resistive targets. Geophysical Prospecting63, 192–210.
    [Google Scholar]
13. HelwigS., WoodW., GlouxB. and HoltenT.2016. A new generation of vertical CSEM receiver. 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Expanded Abstracts.
14. HoltenT., FlekkoyE., SingerB., BlixtE., HanssenA. and MaloyK.2009. Vertical source, vertical receiver, electromagnetic technique for offshore hydrocarbon exploration. First Break27, 89–93.
    [Google Scholar]
15. KjerstadJ.2010. Device for a vertical electromagnetic field component receiver. World patent WO2010041959A1.
16. MaaøF. and NguyenA.2010. Enhanced subsurface response for marine CSEM surveying. Geophysics75, A7–A10.
    [Google Scholar]
17. MacGregorL., NichollsJ., Newall PrattD. and SinhaM.2008. Electromagnetic detector for marine surveying. World patent WO 2008152361 A1.
18. MittetR. and MortenJ.P.2012. Detection and imaging sensitivity of the marine CSEM method. Geophysics77, E411–E425.
    [Google Scholar]
19. SrnkaL.J.1986. Method and apparatus for offshore electromagnetic sounding utilizing wavelength effects to determine optimum source and detector positions. US patent 4,617,518.
20. WebbS., ConstableS., CoxC. and DeatonT.1985. A seafloor electric field instrument. Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity37, 1115–1129.
    [Google Scholar]
21. YoungP. and CoxC.1981. Electromagnetic active source sounding near the East Pacific Rise. Geophysical Research Letters8, 1043–1046.
    [Google Scholar]