1887
PDF

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing technique has been widely used in the development of unconventional oil reservoirs or of enhanced geothermal systems. To prevent the induced fractures from closing, supporting materials (proppants) are pumped into the induced hydraulic fractures. The ultimate goal of hydraulic fracturing is to keep high conductive flow paths from the surrounding formation to the wellbore. In the past decade, some new techniques have been proposed to improve the fracture conductivity (e.g. surface modification agent). Among these techniques, making open channels throughout the induced fracture is one of the most effective options due to its drastic enhancement of conductivity, thereby production. In this technique, fluid with and without proppant is alternately pumped into the well. This treatment creates discontinuous proppant pillars in a hydraulic fracture, and then, the fracture conductivity could be improved significantly. However, proppant slurry behavior inside the fracture still remains poorly understood. In the present study, we applied a smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method to the fluid-solid interaction analysis in order to investigate proppant behavior inside the fracture. Our final goal is to establish analysis method for slurry behavior in hydraulic fractures. As a preliminary step toward the final goal, we simulate the Couette flow between coaxial cylinders to investigate the accuracy of the coupled simulation with the SPH method. We evaluate the L2-norm error as a function of the number of particles along the diameter of the inner cylinder. As a result, about 15 and 20 particles are required to achieve less than 15 % and 10 % error, respectively. Based on this result, at least 20 particles along the diameter of proppant grains should be used. In the future study, many effects (viscosity of fluid, grain shape, fracture roughness) on the efficiency of creating open channels will be investigated by using the proposed method.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2352-8265.20140244
2019-05-26
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/2214-4609/2019/takekawa.html?itemId=/content/papers/10.3997/2352-8265.20140244&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Maxwell, S.
    , 2014, Microseismic imaging of hydraulic fracturing: Improved engineering of unconventional shale reservoirs, 2014 Distinguished Instructor Short Course.
  2. d'Huteau, E., Gillard, M., Miller, M., Pena, A., Johnson, J., Turner, M., Medvedev, O., Rhein, T., Willberg, D.
    , 2011, Open-channel fracturing – A fast track to production, Oilf. Rev., 23, 3, 4–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang, J., Hou, J.
    , 2016, Theoretical conductivity analysis of surface modification agent treated proppant II – Channel fracturing application, Fuel, 165, 28–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Koblitz, A.R., Lovett, S., Nikiforakis, N.
    , 2018, Direct numerical simulation of particle sedimentation in a Bingham fluid, Phys. Rev. Fluids, 3, 9, 093302.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, J., Elsworth, D.
    , 2018, Role of proppant distribution on the evolution of hydraulic fracture conductivity, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 166, 249–262.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Tanimoto, N., Mikada, H., Takekawa, J.
    , 2016, Numerical simulation of flowing sand particles in porous flow for estimating the influence to permeability, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts,35, 3138–3142. doi:10.1190/segam2016‑13883817.1
    https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2016-13883817.1 [Google Scholar]
  7. Lucy, L.B.
    , 1977, A numerical approach to the testing of fusion processes, Astron. J., 82, 1013–1024.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Koshizuka, S., Nobe, A. and Oka, Y.
    , 1998, Numerical analysis of breaking waves using the moving particle semi-implicit method, Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 26, 751–769.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Potyondy, D.O., Cundall, P.A.
    , 2004, A bonded-particle model for rock, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 41, 1329–1364.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2352-8265.20140244
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2352-8265.20140244
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error