1887
Volume 67, Issue 7
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The Rub Al Khali region in Saudi Arabia is characterized by the presence of sand dunes separated by salt flats, also called Sabkhas. In general, the elevation of dunes in this region varies between 90 and 250 m above sea level. The presence of these sand dunes, along with the rapidly changing surface topography poses challenges for seismic data acquisition and processing. The high contrast in acoustic impedance between the dune base and the underlying formation often results in amplification of seismic waves that are recorded at stations located on the surface of sand dunes. Attempts to address the issue using conventional surface‐consistent amplitude scaling methods without reducing these amplification effects generally fail, thus compromising the suitability of the processed data for amplitude versus offset analysis. In this study, we propose a new reference site technique to reduce the effects of sand dune amplification, enabling the production of data sets that are suitable for amplitude versus offset processing. The proposed technique uses a deterministic approach to derive surface‐consistent, frequency‐dependent de‐amplification functions for shots and stations located on the dunes only. Two‐dimensional synthetic and field data examples show that the technique significantly reduces the effects of sand dune amplification.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12751
2019-04-22
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al‐ShuhailA. and Al‐ShaibaniA.2009. Seismic investigation of two coastal sabkhas in eastern Saudi Arabia. Journal of Seismic Exploration18, 329–345.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BonillaL., SteidlJ., LindleyG., TumarkinA. and ArchuletaR.1997. Site amplification in the San Fernando valley, California: variability of site effect estimation using the S‐wave, coda, and H/V methods. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America87, 710–730.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BorcherdtR.D.1970. Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America60, 29–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. CamboisG. and StoffaP.L.1992. Surface‐consistent deconvolution in the log/Fourier domain. Geophysics57, 823–840.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CaryP. and LorentzG.1992. Four‐component surface consistent deconvolution. Geophysics58, 383–392.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CaryP. and NagarajappaN.2013. Questioning the basics of surface‐consistent scaling. 83rd SEG Annual meeting, Houston, Texas, Expanded Abstracts, 418–422.
  7. ChopraS. and CastagnaJ.2014. AVO (Investigations in Geophysics 16). Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. DialloM. and ChenJ.2018. Addressing the effects of sand dunes on seismic data from the Rub Al Khali. GEO 2018 13th Middle East Geosciences Conference and Exhibition, Manama, Bahrain, Extended Abstracts.
  9. DowntonJ.E., RussellB.H. and LinesR.L.2000. AVO for managers: pitfalls and solutions. CREWES Research Report 12.
  10. EtienneV., TonellotT., ThierryP., BerthoumieuxV. and AndreolliC.2014. Optimization of the seismic modeling with the time‐domain finite‐difference method. 84th SEG Annual meeting, Denver, Colorado, Expanded Abstracts, 3536–3540.
  11. FieldE. and JacobK.1995. A comparison and test of various site‐response estimation techniques, including three that are not reference‐site dependent. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America85, 1127–1143.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. FrankelA., CarverD. and WilliamsR.2002. Nonlinear and linear site response and basin effects in Seattle for the M = 6.8 Nisqually, Washington, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America92, 2090–2109.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. FriedmannV.1988. Near‐surface sand effects. First Break6, 83–93
    [Google Scholar]
  14. KomatitschD. and MartinR.2007. An unsplit convolutional perfectly matched layer improved at grazing incidence for the seismic wave equation. Geophysics72, SM155–SM167.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. LeesJ. and ParkJ.1995. Multiple‐taper spectral analysis: a stand‐alone C‐subroutine. Computers and Geosciences21, 199–236.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LevinS.A.1989. Surface‐consistent deconvolution. Geophysics54, 1123–1133.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. LinerC.2008. The seismic sand curve revisited. Geophysics73, A7–A10.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. OlsenK.B. and SchusterG.T.1995. Causes of low‐frequency ground motion amplification in the Salt Lake Basin: the case of the vertically incident P wave. Geophysical Journal International122, 1045–1061.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ParolaiS., BindiD. and AuglieraP.2000. Application of the generalized inversion technique (GIT) to a microzonation study: numerical simulations and comparison with different site‐estimation techniques. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America90, 286–297.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. RobinsonD.K. and Al‐HusseiniM.I.1982. Technique for reflection prospecting in the Rub’ Al‐Khali. Geophysics47, 1135–1152.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. TanerM.T. and KoehlerF.1981. Surface consistent corrections. Geophysics46, 17–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Virieux, J.1986. P‐SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity‐stress finite‐difference method. Geophysics51, 889–901.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12751
Loading
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12751
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Data processing; Sand dune amplification effects; Saudi Arabia

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error