1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Geophysical Prospecting
  4. Volume 67, Issue 7
  5. Article
Volume 67, Issue 7
  • E-ISSN: 1365-2478

Abstract

ABSTRACT

We introduce a concept of generalized blending and deblending, develop its models and accordingly establish a method of deblended‐data reconstruction using these models. The generalized models can handle real situations by including random encoding into the generalized operators both in the space and time domain, and both at the source and receiver side. We consider an iterative optimization scheme using a closed‐loop approach with the generalized blending and deblending models, in which the former works for the forward modelling and the latter for the inverse modelling in the closed loop. We applied our method to existing real data acquired in Abu Dhabi. The results show that our method succeeded to fully reconstruct deblended data even from the fully generalized, thus quite complicated blended data. We discuss the complexity of blending properties on the deblending performance. In addition, we discuss the applicability to time‐lapse seismic monitoring as it ensures high repeatability of the surveys. Conclusively, we should acquire blended data and reconstruct deblended data without serious problems but with the benefit of blended acquisition.

© 2019 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers © 2019 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12801
2019-05-13
2024-04-26

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12801
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AbmaR. and RossA.2013. Popcorn shooting: sparse inversion and the distribution of airgun array energy over time. 83rd SEG Annual meeting Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts.
  2. BagainiC.2006. Overview of simultaneous Vibroseis acquisition methods. 76th SEG Annual meeting Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts.
  3. BagainiC., DalyM. and MooreI.2012. The acquisition and processing of dithered slip‐sweep vibroseis data. Geophysical Prospecting60, 618–639.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. BaraniukR.G.2007. Compressive sensing. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine24, 118–124.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. BerkhoutA.J.2008. Changing the mindset in seismic data acquisition. The Leading Edge27, 924–938.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. BerkhoutA.J.2012. Blended acquisition with dispersed source arrays. Geophysics77, A19–A23.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. BerkhoutA.J.2013. The road ahead in seismic processing. 83rd SEG Annual meeting Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts.
  8. BerkhoutA.J. and BlacquiereG.2013. Effect of noise in blending and deblending. Geophysics78, A35–A38.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. BerkhoutA.J., BlacquiereG. and VerschuurD.J.2009. The concept of double blending: combining incoherent shooting with incoherent sensing. Geophysics74, A59–A62.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. BouskaJ.2010. Distance separated simultaneous sweeping, for fast, clean, vibroseis acquisition. Geophysical Prospecting58, 123–153.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. DeanT.2014. The use of pseudorandom sweeps for vibroseis surveys. Geophysical Prospecting62, 50–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. HerrmannF.J.2010. Randomized sampling and sparsity: getting more information from fewer samples. Geophysics75, WB173–WB187.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. HoweD., FosterM., AllenT., TaylorB. and JackI.2008. Independent simultaneous sweeping – a method to increase the productivity of land seismic crews. 78th SEG Annual meeting Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts.
  14. IbrahimA. and SacchiM.D.2014. Simultaneous source separation using a robust Radon transform. Geophysics79, V1–V11.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. IshikawaS., IshiyamaT., AliM., NakayamaS. and BlacquiereG.2018. Deblended‐data reconstruction using a sparse inversion method with regularization term for further application of blended acquisition in the Middle‐East area. 13th SEGJ International Symposium, Expanded Abstracts.
  16. IshiyamaT., MercadoG. and BelaidK.2012. 3D OBC seismic survey geometry optimization offshore Abu Dhabi. First Break30, 52–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. IshiyamaT., BlacquiereG., VerschuurD.J. and MulderW.2016. 3‐D surface‐wave estimation and separation using a closed‐loop approach. Geophysical Prospecting64, 1413–1427.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. IshiyamaT., IshikawaS., AliM., NakayamaS. and BlacquiereG.2018. Deblended‐data reconstruction using generalized blending and deblending models. 80th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
  19. KontakisA. and VerschuurD.J.2014. Deblending via sparsity‐constrained inversion in the focal domain. 76th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
  20. LinT.T.Y. and HerrmannF.J.2009. Designing simultaneous acquisitions with compressive sensing. 71st EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
  21. MahdadA., DoulgerisP. and BlacquiereG.2011. Separation of blended data by iterative estimation and subtraction of blending interference noise. Geophysics76, Q9–Q17.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. MosherC., LiC., MorleyL., JiY., JaniszewskiF., OlsonR. and BrewerJ.2014. Increasing the efficiency of seismic data acquisition via compressive sensing. The Leading Edge33, 386–391.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. MuellerM.B., HallidayD.F., ManenD.J. and RobertsonJ.O.A.2016. Optimizing near‐orthogonal air‐gun firing sequences for marine simultaneous source separation. Geophysics81, V415–V423.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. NakayamaS., BlacquiereG., IshiyamaT. and IshikawaS.2018. Blended‐acquisition design of irregular geometries towards faster, cheaper, safer and better seismic surveying. Geophysical Prospecting. Online published.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. RozemondH.J.1996. Slip‐sweep acquisition. 66th SEG Annual meeting Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12801
Loading
Research note: deblended‐data reconstruction using generalized blending and deblending models
Geophysical Prospecting 67, 1852 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12801
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12801
/content/journals/10.1111/1365-2478.12801
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Blending; Data processing; Deblending; Generalized model; Inversion

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error