Time‐frequency analysis based on curvelet transforms with time skewing

References

1. BoustaniB., TorabiS., JavaherianA. and MortazaviS.A.2013. Ground roll attenuation using a curvelet‐SVD filter: a case study from the west of Iran. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering10, 055006.
   [Google Scholar]
2. CandèsE.1998. Ridgelets: theory and applications. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
3. CandèsE. and DonohoD.1999. Curvelets. Technical Report Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   [Google Scholar]
4. CandèsE. and DonohoD.2004. New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representations of objects with C2 singularities. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics57, 219–266.
   [Google Scholar]
5. ChaurisH. and NguyenT.2008. Seismic demigration/migration in the curvelet domain. Geophysics73, S35–S46.
   [Google Scholar]
6. DaubechiesI., LuJ. and WuH.T.2011. Synchrosqueezed wavelet transforms: an empirical mode decomposition‐like tool. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis30, 243–261.
   [Google Scholar]
7. DongL., WangD., ZhangY. and ZhouD.2017. Signal enhancement based on complex curvelet transform and complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition. Journal of Applied Geophysics144, 144–150.
   [Google Scholar]
8. DonnoD., ChaurisH. and NobleM.2010. Curvelet‐based multiple prediction. Geophysics75, WB255–WB263.
   [Google Scholar]
9. DoumaH. and de HoopM.V.2004. Wave‐character preserving pre‐stack map migration using curvelets. 74th SEG meeting, Denver, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 961–964.
10. GórszczykA., MalinowskiM. and BellefleurG.2015. Enhancing 3D post‐stack seismic data acquired in hardrock environment using 2D curvelet transform. Geophysical Prospecting63, 903–918.
    [Google Scholar]
11. HennenfentG. and HerrmannF.2004. Three‐term amplitude‐versus‐offset (avo) inversion revisited by curvelet and wavelet transforms. 74th SEG meeting, Denver, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 211–214.
12. Herrmann, F.J., Böniger, U. and Verschuur, D.J.2007. Non‐linear primary‐multiple separation with directional curvelet frames. Geophysical Journal International170, 781–799.
    [Google Scholar]
13. HerrmannF.J. and HennenfentG.2008. Non‐parametric seismic data recovery with curvelet frames. Geophysical Journal International173, 233–248.
    [Google Scholar]
14. KumarV. and HerrmannF.J.2008. Deconvolution with curvelet‐domain sparsity. 78th SEG meeting, Las Vegas, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 1996–2000.
15. KustowskiB., ColeJ., MartinH and Hennenfent, G.2013. Curvelet noise attenuation with adaptive adjustment for spatio‐temporally varying noise. 83th SEG meeting, Houston, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 4299–4303.
16. MallatS.G.1989. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence11, 674–693.
    [Google Scholar]
17. MansinhaL., StockwellR.G. and LoweR.P.1997. Pattern analysis with two‐dimensional spectral localisation: applications of two‐dimensional S transforms. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications239, 286–295.
    [Google Scholar]
18. NaghizadehM. and SacchiM.D.2010. Beyond alias hierarchical scale curvelet interpolation of regularly and irregularly sampled seismic data. Geophysics75, WB189–WB202.
    [Google Scholar]
19. NeelamaniR., BaumsteinA.I., GillardD.G., HadidiM.T. and SorokaW.L.2008. Coherent and random noise attenuation using the curvelet transform. The Leading Edge27, 240–248.
    [Google Scholar]
20. ShahidiR., TangG., MaJ. and Herrmann, F.J.2013. Application of randomized sampling schemes to curvelet‐based sparsity‐promoting seismic data recovery. Geophysical Prospecting61, 973–997.
    [Google Scholar]
21. SinhaS., RouthP.S., AnnoP.D. and Castagna, J.P.2005. Spectral decomposition of seismic data with continuous‐wavelet transform. Geophysics70, 19–25.
    [Google Scholar]
22. YarhamC., BoenigerU. and HerrmannF.2006. Curvelet‐based ground roll removal. 76th SEG meeting, New Orleans, USA, Expanded Abstracts, 2777–2780.