1887

Abstract

Summary

Several cases have been conducted to address the permeability modeling and estimation, but all were not accurate because of the heteroscedasticity between data. Therefore, integrating the microfacies sequences into permeability modeling became a crucial to obtain accurate prediction and then improve the overall reservoir characterization. The discrete microfacies distribution leads to distinct regression lines given each microfacies type. Therefore, the Random Forest (RF) algorithm was considered in this paper for microfacies classification and Smooth Generalized Additive Modeling (sGAM) was considered for permeability modeling as a function of well logging data and the predicted discrete microfacies distribution. The well logging records that were incorporated into the microfacies classification and permeability modeling: SP, ILD and density porosity logs. These two approaches were adopted in a well in a sandstone reservoir, located in East Texas basin. The effectiveness of using RF and sGAM approaches was investigated by their performance to handle wide ranges of data given the five microfacies types. More specifically, the Random Forest Modeling was super accurate to predict the microfacies distribution at the missing intervals for the same well and other wells. Moreover, the sGAM resulted to obtain accurate modeling and prediction of permeability in high and low permeable intervals.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902189
2019-09-02
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Mudhafer, W.J. M.Using Generalized Linear Regression of Multiple Attributes for Modeling and Prediction the Formation Permeability in Sandstone Reservoir. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, (2014).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Mudhafar, W. J. and Al-Khazraji, A. K.Non-Parametric Adaptive Regression Splines for Multisource Permeability Modeling in a Sandstone Oil Reservoir. Offshore Technology Conference Asia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Mudhafar, W. and Rostami, A.Comparative Applied Multivariate Geostatistical Algorithms for Formation Permeability Modeling. The 20th Formation Evaluation Symposium of Japan, Chiba, Japan (2014).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Silva, F. P. T., Ghani, A. A., Al Mansoori, A. and Bahar, A.Rock Type Constrained 3D Reservoir Characterization and Modeling. The Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE (2002).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brockett, P. L., Chuang, S. L., Pitaktong, U.Generalized Additive Models and Nonparametric Regression. Predictive Modeling Applications in Actuarial Science: Volume 1, Predictive Modeling Techniques, 367 (2014).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hastie, T. J. and Tibshirani, Generalized R. J.Additive Models, Vol. 43. CRC Press (1990).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902189
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902189
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error