1887

Abstract

Summary

Modelling fracture intensity at the reservoir scale is challenging due to the scarcity of spatially exhaustive data and the sampling bias caused by the small support size of wellbore image logs. Multiple attempts have aimed at accounting for this sampling bias, but most have treated the fracture intensity measured from well logs as hard data that needs to be honoured during geostatistical modelling. In this paper, we demonstrate that there may be large uncertainties associated with upscaling well log derived fracture intensities to the reservoir scale, and then provide a mechanism for quantifying this uncertainty and provide a workflow for propagating it through the reservoir modelling process. Specifically, we use Bayesian inference from data collected empirically from a set of fit-for-purpose prior fracture networks. We then develop a workflow to model the reservoir fracture intensity uncertainty away from the wells, while integrating non-linear multivariate secondary data. 3D models of probability density function of reservoir fracture intensity are thus obtained for the entire reservoir, which can then be used to generate different scenarios of discrete fracture networks. Models created with this approach are compared between different simulation methods, demonstrating the value of accounting for non-linearity in secondary data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902234
2019-09-02
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alabert, F.G. [1987] Stochastic imaging of spatial distributions using hard and soft information. Stanford University (Master thesis).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bisdom, K., Gauthier, B.D.M., Bertotti, G. and Hardebol, N.J. [2014] Calibrating discrete fracture-network models with a carbonate three-dimensional outcrop fracture network: implications for naturally fractured reservoir modeling. AAPG Bulletin, 98(7), 1351–1376.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Drucker, H., Burges, C., Kaufman, L., Smola, A. and Vapnik, V. [1997] Support vector regression machine. Advances in neural information processing systems, 28(7). 779–784.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Garcia, M.H. and Gauthier, B.D.M. [2018] DFN simulation to quantify fracture density uncertainty in wells. Impact of some typical geological constraints. Third EAGE Workshop on Naturally Fractured Reservoirs, Muscat, Oman.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gauthier, B.D.M., Garcia, M. and Daniel, J.-M. [2002] Integrated fractured reservoir characterization: a case study in a North Africa Field. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mauldon, M. and Mauldon, J.G. [1997] Fracture sampling on a cylinder: from scanlines to boreholes and tunnels. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 30(3), 129–144.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. McLennan, J.A., Alwardt, P.F., Hennings, P.H. and Farrell, H.E. [2009] Multivariate fracture intensity prediction: application to Oil Mountain anticline, Wyoming. AAPG Bulletin, 93(11), 1585–1595.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ouenes, A. [2000] Practical application of fuzzy logic and neural networks to fractured reservoir characterization. Computers & Geosciences, 26, 953–962.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Silverman, B.W. [1986] Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability.Chapman and Hall, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Terzaghi, R.D. [1965] Sources of error in joint surveys. Géothechnique, 15(3), 287–304.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Verly, G.W. [1992] Sequential Gaussian cosimulation: a simulation method integrating several types of information. Geostatistics Troia’92.Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 543–554.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902234
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902234
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error