Bayesian Rock Physics Inversion for CO2 Storage Monitoring

References

1. Archie, G.E. [1942] The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the American Intitute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers, 146, 55–62.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Biot, M. [1956] Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated porous solid - I. Low-frequency range, II. Higher frequency range. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 28, 168–178.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bøe, L.Z., Park, J., Vöge, M. and Sauvin, G. [2017] Filtering out seabed pipeline influence to improve the resistivity image of an offshore CO2 storage site. In: EAGE/SEG Research Workshop 2017, Geophysical Monitoring of CO2 Injection UCCS and CO2-EOR.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brie, A., Pampuri, F., Marsala, A. and Meazza, O. [1995] Shear sonic interpretation in gas-bearing sands. SPE Annual Technical Conf. 30595, 701–710.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Carcione, J., Picotti, S., Gei, D. and Rossi, G. [2006] Physics and seismic modeling for monitoring CO2 storage. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 163, 175–207.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dean, M. and Tucker, O. [2017] A risk-based framework for Measurement, Monitoring and Verification (MMV) of the Goldeneye storage complex for thePeterhead CCS project, UK. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 61, 1–15.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dupuy, B., Garambois, S., Asnaashari, A., Balhareth, H.M., Landrø, M., Stovas, A. and Virieux, J. [2016] Estimation of rock physics properties from seismic attributes - Part II: Applications. Geophysics, 81(4), M55-M69.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dupuy, B., Romdhane, A., Eliasson, P., Querendez, E., Yan, H., Torres, V. and Ghaderi, A. [2017] Quantitative seismic characterization of CO2 at the Sleipner storage site, North Sea. Interpretation, 5(4), SS23-SS42.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Eliasson, P. and Romdhane, A. [2017] Uncertainty quantification in waveform-based imaging methods - a Sleipner CO2 monitoring study. Energy Procedia, 114, 3905–3915.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gassmann, F. [1951] Über die elastizität poröser medien. Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zurich, 96, 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Queißer, M. and Singh, S.C. [2013] Full waveform inversion in the time lapse mode applied to CO2 storage at Sleipner. Geophysical Prospecting, 61(3), 537–555.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Romdhane, A. and Querendez, E. [2014] CO2 characterization at the Sleipner field with full waveform inversion: application to synthetic and real data. Energy Procedia, 63, 4358–4365.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Sambridge, M.S. [1999a] Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm - I. Searching a parameter space. Geophysical Journal International, 138, 479–494.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Sambridge, M.S. [1999b] Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm - II. Appraising the ensemble. Geophysical Journal International, 138, 727–746.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Teja, A. and Rice, P. [1981] Generalized corresponding states method for viscosities of liquid mixtures. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 20, 77–81.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Yan, H., Dupuy, B., Romdhane, A. and Arntsen, B. [2019] CO2 saturation estimates at Sleipner (North Sea) from seismic tomography and rock physics inversion. Geophysical Prospecting, 67(4), 1055–1071.
    [Google Scholar]