1887

Abstract

Summary

Hanging-wall traps are successful trapping styles with discoveries made in many sedimentary basins worldwide. Examples of hanging-wall traps are documented in the literature but there are very few case studies that describe the role played by fault-rock seal on trap integrity. This contribution focuses on hanging-wall traps that are dependent upon fault-rock seal. Detailed analysis of hanging-wall traps has revealed that the hydrocarbon column height trapped by fault-rock seal appears to be independent of burial depth and is typically less than 190m in height. A similar observation was observed in footwall traps that are dependent on fault-rock seal. Cross-plots of Shale Gouge Ratio (SGR) and buoyancy pressure from hanging-wall traps have a similar data distribution to published SGR – buoyancy pressure calibration plots. Gas-bearing hanging-wall traps are at or close to seal capacity when burial depths are less than 3500m. In contrast, gas-bearing footwall traps are at seal capacity at burial depths greater than 3500m. Published ‘global’ calibration plots of SGR vs buoyancy pressure can be used to evaluate the sealing or non-sealing risk of hanging-wall traps in the same manner as for footwall traps.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902300
2019-09-08
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bretan, P., Yielding, G. & Jones, H.
    2003. Using calibrated shale gouge ratio to estimate hydrocarbon column heights. American Association Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 87, 397–413.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fristad, T., Groth, A., Yielding, G., & Freeman, B.
    1997. Quantitative fault seal prediction: a case study from Oseberg Syd. In: MØLLER-PEDERSEN, P. & KOESTLER, A.G. (eds). Hydrocarbon Seals: Importance for exploration and production, NPF Special Publication7, 107–124, Elsevier, Singapore.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hindle, A.D.
    1989. Down-thrown Traps of the NW Witch Ground Graben, UK North Sea. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 12, 405–419.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Moseley, B.A.
    1999. Down-thrown closures of the Outer Moray Firth. In: FLEET, A.J. & BOLDY, S.A.R. (eds), Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe: Proceedings of the 5th Conference, 861–878.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Yielding, G., Freeman, B. & Needham, T.
    1997. Quantitative Fault Seal Prediction. American Association Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 81, 897–917.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Yielding, G., Bretan, P.G., & Freeman, B.
    2010. Fault seal calibration: a brief review. In: JOLLEY, S.J., FISHER, Q.J., AINSWORTH, R.B., VROLIJK, P.J. & DELISLE, S. (eds), Reservoir Compartmentalization, Geological SocietyLondon, Special Publications, 347, 243–255.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902300
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902300
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error