1887

Abstract

Summary

Environmental contamination due to human activity is recognized as one of the modern dangers of our industrial advancements. The current approach to the management and monitoring of contaminated aquatic and non-aquatic sediments involves invasive, often labor-intensive methods. The method is time-consuming and costly and the resulting contours of the contaminant distribution are subject to a number of potential errors, with the potential for ‘hot spots’ to remain unmapped. At present, there are no means for the passive, in-situ mapping of contaminants in aquatic and non-aquatic sediments.

Our method addresses the main problems associated with the current approach. We propose a method that provide rapid, spatially detailed data on contaminant distributions and concentrations in sediments by using a gamma-ray spectrometer. A gamma-ray spectrometer can be used for mapping aquatic sediments (by using a vessel as platform) and non-aquatic sediments as floodplains by using a quad-bike or drone as platform for mapping.

The study shows how these gamma-ray spectrometers have been used to map the contamination of a river basin of the Elbe tributary in Germany. The combination of all platforms result in information on contaminant levels of a river system in aquatic and non-aquatic sediments.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902387
2019-09-08
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Förstner, U., Hollert, H., Brinkmann, M., Eichbaum, K., Weber, R., Salomons, W.
    , 2016. Dioxin in the Elbe river basin: policy and science under the water framework directive 2000-2015 and toward 2021. Environmental Sciences Europe28, 9. doi:10.1186/s12302‑016‑0075‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-016-0075-8 [Google Scholar]
  2. Jacobs, P., Schaffranka, E., Zauter, H.
    , 2015. Organic contaminants in suspended particles, sediments, and floodplains of the Spittelwasser creek and the Mulde river with regard to their relevance in the Elbe river basin. Hydrologie und Wasserbewirtschaftung59, 342–353.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. van der Graaf, E.R., Koomans, R.L., Limburg, J., De Vries, K.
    , 2007. In situ radiometric mapping as a proxy of sediment contamination: Assessment of the underlying geochemical and physical principles. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Van Egmond, F.M., Van Der Veeke, S., Knotters, M., Koomans, R.L., Limburg, J.
    , 2018. Mapping soil texture with a gamma-ray spectrometer: comparison between UAV and proximal measurements and traditional sampling. WOt-technical Rep. 137, 58p.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Van Wijngaarden, M., Venema, L.B., De Meijer, R.J., Zwolsman, J.J.G.
    , 2002. Radiometric sand -mud characterisation in the Rhine - Meuse estuary Part A. Fingerprinting. Geomorphology43, 87–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. van der Perk, M.
    , 2006. Soil and Water Contamination From Molecular to Catchment Scale, 1st ed. Taylor Amp; Francis Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902387
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902387
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error