Time-Lapse Target-Oriented Crosswell Full Waveform Inversion without Downhole Sources

References

1. Ajo-Franklin, J., Peterson, J., Doetsch, J. and Daley, T.
   [2013] High-resolution characterization of a CO2 plume using crosswell seismic tomography: Cranfield, MS, USA. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 18, 497–509.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Almalki, M., Harris, B. and Dupuis, J. C.
   [2013] Field and synthetic experiments for virtual source crosswell tomography in vertical wells: Perth Basin, Western Australia. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 98, 144–159.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bunks, C., Saleck, F. M., Zaleski, S. and Chavent, G.
   [1995] Multiscale seismic waveform inversion. Geophysics, 60(5), 1457–1473.
   [Google Scholar]
4. da Costa, C. A. N., Costa, J. C., Medeiros, W. E., Verschuur, D. J. and Soni, A. K.
   [2018] Target-level waveform inversion: a prospective application of the convolution-type representation for the acoustic wavefield. Geophysical Prospecting, 67(1), 69–84.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Daley, T. M., Freifeld, B. M., Ajo-Franklin, J., Dou, S., Pevzner, R., Shulakova, V., Kashikar, S., Miller, D. E., Goetz, J., Henninges, J. and Lueth, S.
   [2013] Field testing of fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) for subsurface seismic monitoring. The Leading Edge, 32(6), 699–706.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Fehler, M. and Pearson, C.
   [1984] Cross-hole seismic surveys: Applications for studying subsurface fracture systems at a hot dry rock geothermal site. Geophysics, 49(1), 37–45.
   [Google Scholar]
7. HubbardS.S. and LindeN.
   [2011] Hydrogeophysics. Treatise on Water Science, Elsevier.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Kamei, R., Jang, U. G., Lumley, D., Takanashi, M., Nakatsukasa, M., Mouri, T. and Kato, A.
   [2017] Time-lapse full-waveform inversion for cross-well monitoring of microbubble injection. 87th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded abstract, 1439–1443.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Lu, Z. and Sabatier, J. M.
   [2009] Effects of soil water potential and moisture content on sound speed. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 73(5), 1614–1625.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Lüth, S., Bergmann, P., Cosma, C., Enescu, N., Giese, R., Götz, J., Ivanova, A., Juhlin, C., Kashubin, A., Yang, C. and Zhang, F.
    [2011] Time-lapse seismic surface and down-hole measurements for monitoring CO2 storage in the CO2SINK project (Ketzin, Germany). Energy Procedia, 4, 3435–3442.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Metivier, L. and Brossier, R.
    [2016] The SEISCOPE optimization toolbox: A large-scale nonlinear optimization library based on reverse communication. Geophysics, 81(2), F1–F15.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Minato, S., Matsuoka, T., Tsuji, T., Draganov, D., Hunziker, J. and Wapenaar, K.
    [2011] Seismic interferometry using multidimensional deconvolution and crosscorrelation for crosswell seismic reflection data without borehole sources. Geophysics, 76(1), SA19–SA34.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Pratt, R. G.
    [1999] Seismic waveform inversion in the frequency domain, Part 1: Theory and verification in a physical scale model. Geophysics, 64(3), 888–901.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Saito, H., Nobuoka, D., Azuma, H., Xue, Z. and Tanase, D.
    [2006] Time-lapse crosswell seismic tomography for monitoring injected CO2 in an onshore aquifer, Nagaoka, Japan. Exploration Geophysics, 37(1), 30–36.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Wapenaar, K., van der Neut, J., Ruigrok, E., Draganov, D., Hunziker, J., Slob, E., Thorbecke, J. and Snieder, R.
    [2011] Seismic interferometry by crosscorrelation and by multidimensional deconvolution: a systematic comparison. Geophysical Journal International, 185(3), 1335–1364.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Weemstra, C., Wapenaar, K. and van Dalen, K. N.
    [2017] Reflecting boundary conditions for interferometry by multidimensional deconvolution. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(4), 2242–2257.
    [Google Scholar]