1887

Abstract

Summary

3-D MT inversion has been widely used to describe deep subsurface structures, but MT data are prone to be contaminated with noise. Although some pre-processing is done before inversion, the quality of some data can still be poor. To prevent noisy data from degrading inversion results, we may exclude noisy data in the inversion process. In this case, we need to consider the trade-off between the quality and quantity of data. We investigate the influence of the data-selection procedure on inversion results using AMT data acquired in Gyeongju, South Korea. Our inversion results show that the balance between the quality and quantity of data is important to obtain reasonable inversion results.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902432
2019-09-08
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Avdeev, D. and Avdeeva, A.
    [2009] 3D magnetotelluric inversion using a limited-memory quasiNewton optimization. Geophysics, 74(3), F45-F57.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Constable, S. C., Parker, R. L. and Constable, C. G.
    [1987] Occam’s inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics, 52(3), 289–300.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Jahandari, H. and Farquharson, C.G.
    [2017] 3-D minimum-structure inversion of magnetotelluric data using the finite-element method and tetrahedral grids. Geophysical Journal International, 211, 1189–1205.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Nam, M. J. and Kim, H. J.
    [2010] 3D MT Inversion Using an Edge Finite Element Modeling Algorithm. Geosystem Engineering, 13(2), 43–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Slezak, K., Jozwiak, W., Nowozynski, K., Orynski, S. and Brasse, H.
    [2019] 3-D studies of MT data in the Central Polish Basin: Influence of inversion parameters, model space and transfer function selection. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 161, 26–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Rogers, S.
    [2005] Data Processing User Guide Version 3.0.Phoenix Geophysics Limited, 1–201.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. [2010] V5 System 2000 MTU/MTU-A User Guide Version 2.0. Phoenix Geophysics Limited, 1–179.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Romero-Ruiz, I. and Pous, J.
    [2019] The magnetotelluric impedance tensor through Clifford algebras: part I - theory. Geophysical Prospecting, 67, 651–669.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. [2019] The magnetotelluric impedance tensor through Clifford algebras: part II - a constrained stochastic heuristic method for recovering the magnetotelluric regional impedance tensor in 2D/3D case. Geophysical Prospecting, 67, 670–695.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhdanov, M. S.
    [2002] Geophysical Inverse Theory and Regularization Problems. Elsevier, 74–161.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902432
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902432
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error