Combined 3D Inversion of Ground and Airborne Electromagnetic Data over Iron Ore in Kiruna

References

1. Cherevatova, M., Nittinger, C., Becken, M., Guenther, T. and DesmexWg
   [2017] 3D inversion of the semi-airborne electromagnetic data from Schleiz, Germany. Near Surface Geoscience Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Malmö, Sweden (extended abstract).
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cherevatova, M., Becken, M., Steuer, A., and DesmexWg
   [2018] A new semi-airborne system for mineral exploration. Results of the first flight experiments. 7th International Workshop on Airborne electromagnetics (extended abstract).
   [Google Scholar]
3. Egbert, G.D. and Kelbert, A.
   [2012] Computational recipes for electromagnetic inverse problems. Geophysical Journal International, 189(1), 251–267.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Elliott, P.
   [1996] New airborne electromagnetic method provides fast deep-target data turnaround. The Leading Edge, 15(4) 309–310.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Grayver, A. V., Streich, R., and Ritter, O.
   [2013] Three-dimensional parallel distributed inversion of CSEM data using a direct forward solver. Geophysical Journal International, 193(3), 1432–1446.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Mogi, T., Tanaka, Y., Kusunoki, K., Morikawa, T., and Jomori, N.
   [1998] Development of grounded electrical source airborne transient EM (GREATEM). Exploration Geophysics, 29(1/2), 61–64
   [Google Scholar]
7. Mörbe, W., Yogeshwar, P., and Tezkan, B.
   [2018] Investigation of deep mineral deposits in Germany: Multidimensional inversion of long offset CSEM data in time and frequency domain. Proceedings of the 24th Electromagnetic Induction Workshop, Helsingor, Denmark.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Nittinger, C., Cherevatova, M., Becken, M., Martin, T., Petersen, H., Steuer, A., Meyer, U., Siemon, B., Matzander, U., Friedrichs, B., Mörbe, W., Yogeshwar, P., Tezkan, B., Rochlitz, T., and Günther, T.
   [2017] A Novel Semi-airborne EM System for Mineral Exploration - First Results from Combined Fluxgate and Induction Coil Data. Near Surface Geoscience Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Malmö, Sweden (extended abstract).
   [Google Scholar]
9. Schiffler, M., Chwala, A., Kukowski, N., Meyer, H. G., Meyer, M., Meyer, U., and Stolz, R.
   [2017] Development of new magnetic field sensors for electromagnetic mineral exploration in the DESMEX project. Fruehjahrstagung der Deutschen Geophysikalischen Gesellschaft.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Seigel, H. O.
    [1971] A recent development in Semi-Airborne Electromagnetic Prospecting. ASEG Bulletin, 2(3) 25–45.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Smirnov, M. Y.
    [2003] Magnetotelluric data processing with a robust statistical procedure having a high breakdown point. Geophysical Journal International, 152(1), 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Steuer, A., Preugschat, B., Cherevatova, M., Mörbe, W., Yogeshwar, P., Günther, T, Rochlitz, R., Schiffler, M., Costabel, S., Müller, F., and the DESMEXWG
    [2019] Validation of semi-airborne 3D inversion results using airborne and ground-based EM methods, as well as geological models and borehole measurements. EGU General Assembly (abstract).
    [Google Scholar]
13. Streich, R.
    [2016] Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Approaches for Hydrocarbon Exploration and Monitoring on Land. Surveys in Geophysics, 37(1), 47–80.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Yang, D., and Oldenburg, D. W.
    [2016] 3D inversion of total magnetic intensity data for time-domain EM at the Lalor massive sulphide deposit. Exploration Geophysics, 48(2), 110–123.
    [Google Scholar]