1887

Abstract

Summary

In some recent geophysical monitoring studies, researchers have proposed a method of difference inversion, which means taking the difference between data into inversion process. It overcomes the crucial problem of the initial model for local optimization and reduce the environmental or system error in the results. Until now, there has not been an application of this method in the global inversion of Seismic Surface Waves. However using directly the difference between the dispersion curves as the data to be inverted can be not robust. Here, we propose to calculate differences between dispersion diagrams, which contains a part of the measurement uncertainty. Based on histograms distances definitions, several diagram distance calculations are used and tested numerically and experimentally in order to study the impact of the distance definition on the misfit assessment in case of a small variation about 10% in a deep part of a 2-layer medium. Results show the feasibility of this method. even if the accuracy of the the inversion result of the preliminary part remains a key issue on the assessment of medium’s variation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902531
2019-09-08
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. [1]Wang, Ao, et al. “Impact of Small Shear Wave Velocity Variations on Surface Wave Phase Velocity Inversion.” 24th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics. 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]Yang, Di, et al. “Carbon sequestration monitoring with acoustic double-difference waveform inversion: A case study on SACROC walkaway VSP data.” SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2011. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2011. 4273–4277.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]Dangeard, Marine, et al. “Estimating picking errors in near-surface seismic data to enable their time-lapse interpretation of hydrosystems.” Near Surface Geophysics16.6 (2018): 613–625.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. [4]Cha, Sung-Hyuk, and Sargur N.Srihari. “On measuring the distance between histograms.” Pattern Recognition35.6 (2002): 1355–1370.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. [5]Bretaudeau, François, et al. “Small-scale modeling of onshore seismic experiment: A tool to validate numerical modeling and seismic imaging methods.” Geophysics76.5 (2011): T101–T112.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. [6]Wathelet, Marc. “An improved neighborhood algorithm: parameter conditions and dynamic scaling.” Geophysical Research Letters35.9 (2008).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902531
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902531
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error