1887

Abstract

Summary

Pulsed GPR has been the main GPR technology for more than 30 years. However, stepped-frequency continuous-wave (SFCW) GPR technology presents two documented advantages compared to pulsed GPR: a bandwidth wider than the typical definition of “UWB”, and an approx. up to 20 dB higher signal-to-noise ratio. This results in larger penetration depths and improved resolution without salt-and-pepper noise.

In late 2017, SFCW technology became commercially available for concrete, where a system with frequency range 0.2–4.0 GHz demonstrably delivers both better resolution and depth penetration without post-processing filters. Since 2018, the SFCW GPR instrument is increasingly used for locating shallowly-buried utilities, an application so far addressed with pulsed-GPR devices.

We collected SFCW GPR data in soil to investigate the reason behind this trend, revealing that the technology’s benefits extend beyond concrete.

The SFCW GPR system can not only detect closely-spaced utilities but also resolve them uniquely within a bundle as countable hyperbolas, within typical depths, even though it was not developed with this application in mind.

Thus, with SFCW GPR subsurface investigators receive information beyond a “dig / no-dig” decision and can deliver insights that improve BIM and increase clarity for all stakeholders of infrastructure planning, monitoring and maintenance operations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902535
2019-09-08
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Annan, A. P.
    [2002] GPR—History, Trends, and Future Developments.Subsurface Sensing Technologies and Applications, 3(4), 253–270, doi:10.1023/a:1020657129590.
    https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020657129590 [Google Scholar]
  2. Jol, H. M.
    [1995] Ground penetrating radar antennae frequencies and transmitter powers compared for penetration depth, resolution and reflection continuity.Geophysical prospecting, 43(5), 693–709.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Tronca, G., S.Lehner, L.Raj, I.Tsalicoglou, J.Meier, and R.Mennicke
    [2017], Looking into concrete – multiple frequency usage in radar products to detect structural parameters and defects faster and more accurately.15th Asia Pacific Conference for Non-Destructive Testing (APCNDT2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. PieracciniM.
    [2017] Noise Performance Comparison Between Continuous Wave and Stroboscopic Pulse Ground Penetrating Radar.IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, pp(99):1–5, 10.1109/LGRS.2017.2781458.
    https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2017.2781458 [Google Scholar]
  5. Tronca, G., S.Lehner, I.Tsalicoglou
    [2018] Looking into concrete and masonry structures – usage of multiple frequency radar products to detect structural parameters and defects.12th European Conference for Non-Destructive Testing (12th ECNDT).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902535
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201902535
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error