Uncertainty Quantification and History Matching for Naturally Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs

References

1. Akbar, M., Vissapragada, B., Alghamdi, A.H., Allen, D., Herron, M., Carnegie, A., Dutta, D., Olesen, J.R., Chourasiya, R.D., Logan, D. and Stief, D.
   [2000] A snapshot of carbonate reservoir evaluation. Oilfield Review, 12(4), pp. 20–21.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Berre, I., Doster, F. and Keilegavlen, E.
   [2018] Flow in fractured porous media: A review of conceptual models and discretization approaches. Transport in Porous Media, pp. 1–22.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bisdom, K., Bertotti, G. and Nick, H.M.
   [2016] The impact of different aperture distribution models and critical stress criteria on equivalent permeability in fractured rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121(5), pp. 4045–4063.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Boyd, A., Souza, A., Carneiro, G., Machado, V., Trevizan, W., Santos, B., Netto, P., Bagueira, R., Polinski, R. and Bertolini, A.
   [2015] Presalt carbonate evaluation for Santos Basin, offshore Brazil. Petrophysics, 56(06), pp. 577–591.
   [Google Scholar]
5. DARTS
   [2019] Delft Advanced Research Terra Simulator. https://darts.citg.tudelft.nl
   [Google Scholar]
6. de Hoop, S., Voskov, D.V., Vossepoel, F.C. and Jung, A.
   [2018] Quantification Of Coarsening Effect On Response Uncertainty In Reservoir Simulation. In ECMOR XVI-16th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Geuzaine, C. and Remacle, J.F.
   [2009] Gmsh: A 3-D finite element mesh generator with built-in pre-and post-processing facilities. International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 79(11), pp. 1309–1331.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Huang, S., Zhang, Y., Zheng, X., Zhu, Q., Shao, G., Cao, Y., Chen, X., Yang, Z. and Bai, X.
   [2017] Types and characteristics of carbonate reservoirs and their implication on hydrocarbon exploration: A case study from the eastern Tarim Basin, NW China. Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience, 2(1), pp. 73–79.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Karimi-Fard, M., Durlofsky, L. J., and Aziz, K.
   [2004] An efficient discrete fracture model applicable for general-purpose reservoir simulators. SPE Journal, 9, 227–236.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Mello, M.R., Bender, A.A. and De Mio, E.
    [2011] Giant sub-salt hydrocarbon province of the greater Campos Basin, Brazil.. In OTC Brasil. Offshore Technology Conference.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Müller, F., Jenny, P. and Meyer, D.W.
    [2013] Multilevel Monte Carlo for two phase flow and Buckley–Leverett transport in random heterogeneous porous media. Journal of Computational Physics, 250, pp. 685–702.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Moinfar, A., Narr, W., Hui, M.H., Mallison, B.T. and Lee, S.H.
    [2011] Comparison of discrete-fracture and dual-permeability models for multiphase flow in naturally fractured reservoirs.. In SPE reservoir simulation symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Reijmer, J. J., Johan, H., Jaarsma, B., & Boots, R.
    [2017] Seismic stratigraphy of dinantian carbonates in the southern netherlands and northern belgium. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, 96 (4), 353–379.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Scheidt, C. and Caers, J.
    [2009] Representing spatial uncertainty using distances and kernels. Mathematical Geosciences, 41(4), p. 397.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Scheidt, C., Caers, J., Chen, Y. and Durlofsky, L.J.
    [2011] A multi-resolution workflow to generate high-resolution models constrained to dynamic data. Computational Geosciences, 15(3), pp. 545–563.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Tomin, P., Voskov, D.
    , [2018] Robust and accurate formulation for modeling of acid stimulation, ECMOR XVI-16th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Voskov, D.V.
    [2017] Operator-based linearization approach for modeling of multiphase multi-component flow in porous media. Journal of Computational Physics, 337, pp. 275–288.
    [Google Scholar]