1887

Abstract

Summary

Mauddud Reservoir is characterized as low permeability with moderate to good porosity and variable fracture density. The reservoir can be subdivided into 2 units, lower unit been very tight and lack any oil stains, and upper unit which ranges from 5 to 10 feet of good oil column based on diagenesis process. Ideally horizontal wells were best option to exploit this thin reservoir, but production in Mauddud wells results varied a lot due to tight rock and low-pressure support. This decline is associated with high GOR, wells that shut in for some time reveal later to flow back to production. A study been carried out to review opportunities in over 20 horizontal wells to revive these wells thru integration of dynamic data with static data and utilizing latest new technologies in the industry. A thorough geological study integrating all the available data was carried out initially. Wells were screened for stimulation by using various proven new technologies. Acid Frac, multi Stage Frac, near wellbore acid-jet and Matrix Acid techniques have been applied with varying results. Advanced placement technique like distributed temperature profiling was used in some of the jobs.

This paper presents the details of the application of the above mentioned technologies, to the candidate wells and discusses the results. The success of some of these technologies opened up new opportunities for a new beginning to revive the closed wells completed in Mauddud Formation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201903138
2019-11-18
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Kristian NPedersen; KOC - Chevron
    , “Main Mauddud 2005 Static Geologic Model”, KOC internal report, March 15,2006
    [Google Scholar]
  2. SalemAl-Sabea, SimonStonard, MonaAl-Rushaid, MiriamAl-Saeed, AhmedAddas, KamalOsman
    “PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MAUDDUD RESERVOIR IN BURGAN FIELD”, KOC internal report, May 2006
    [Google Scholar]
  3. HaiqingWu; KOCChevron
    ; “Fracture Distribution in Mauddud Formation, Greater Burgan—Fracture Data, Characterization, Modeling, Calibration, Present Day Stress, and Permeability Enhancement”, KOC internal report, May 2006
    [Google Scholar]
  4. JayantaBardalaye, CharlesNayapamu et al.
    ; “Mauddud Reactivation”, KOC internal report February 2012
    [Google Scholar]
  5. D.E.Simon and M.S.Andereon
    , “Stability of Clay Minerals in Acid” SPE 19422, SPE Formation Damage Control Symposium held in Lafayette, LouisianaFebruary 22–23, 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dave Thompson, EnCana and KeithRispler , ShawnStadnyck, OtmarHoch and B.W.McDaniel
    , “Operators Evaluate Various stimulation Techniques for Multizone Stimulation of Horizontal wells in North East British Columbia”, SPE 119620, SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, Wood land Texas-2009
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Mishari AlSaqabi, NazGazi, ChimmalgiVishwanath, Hasan AlBahrani, NaweenTurkey, EmanAbdul-Razaq, OmranAl-Zankawi, and AliBouland, Kuwait Oil Company; Jim B.Surjaatmadja, Abdulla M. AlHamad, and ShannonBrand, Halliburton
    , “Unique Process and Tool Provides Better Acid Stimulation and Better Production Results”, SPE 163384, KIPCE 2012
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201903138
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201903138
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error