A Distributed Fibre-Optic Sensing Monitoring Platform for CCUS

References

1. Boitz, N. and Shapiro, S. [2024]. Detection of microseismic events in continuous DAS data using convolutional neural networks.The Leading Edge, 43, 16–22.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Correa, J., Tertyshnikov, K., Wood, T., Yavuz, S., Freifeld, B. and Pevzner, R. [2018]. October. Time-lapse VSP with permanent seismic sources and distributed acoustic sensors: CO2CRC Stage 3 equipment trials. In 14th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference Melbourne (pp. 21–26).
   [Google Scholar]
3. Correa, J.C. et al [2020]. Fibre-optics Sensing and Permanent Sources for Seismic Monitoring of a Large-scale CCUS site in Decatur, Illinois: Preliminary Results and Lessons Learnt, EAGE Workshop on Fibre Optic Sensing for Energy Applications in Asia Pacific.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Global CCS Institute [2023]. Global Status of CCS – Scaling Up Through 2030.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Glubokovskikh, S., Shashkin, P., Shapiro, S., Gurevich, B. and Pevzner, R. [2023]. Multiwell Fiber Optic Sensing Reveals Effects of CO2 Flow on Triggered Seismicity, Seismol. Res. Lett.94, 2215–2230, doi: 10.1785/0220230025.
   https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230025 [Google Scholar]
6. Isaenkov, R., et al. [2021]. An automated system for continuous monitoring of CO2 geosequestration using multi-well offset VSP with permanent seismic sources and receivers: Stage 3 of the CO2CRC Otway Project. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 108, p.103317.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Maxwell, S. C. [2010]. Microseismic: Growth born from success.The Leading Edge, 29, 338–343.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Pevzner, R., et al. [2021]. Seismic monitoring of a small CO2 injection using a multi-well DAS array: Operations and initial results of Stage 3 of the CO2CRC Otway project.International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 110, p.103437.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Nation Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Safe geologic storage of captured carbon dioxide: two decades of DOE’s carbon storage R&D program in Review, 13 April 2020.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Net Zero Roadmap, A Global Pathway to keep the 1.5 °C Goal in Reach, International Energy Agency.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Pevzner, R., Isaenkov, R., Yavuz, S., Yurikov, A., Tertyshnikov, K., Shashkin, P., Gurevich, B., Correa, J., Glubokovskikh, S., Wood, T. and Freifeld, B. [2021]. Seismic monitoring of a small CO2 injection using a multi-well DAS array: Operations and initial results of Stage 3 of the CO2CRC Otway project.International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 110, p.103437.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Pevzner, R., Glubokovskikh, S., Isaenkov, R., Shashkin, P., Tertyshnikov, K., Yavuz, S., Gurevich, B., Correa, J., Wood, T. and Freifeld, B. [2022]. Monitoring subsurface changes by tracking direct-wave amplitudes and traveltimes in continuous distributed acoustic sensor VSP data.Geophysics, 87(1), A1–A6.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ricard, L.P. [2020]. Using distributed temperature sensing to inform the quality of cementing operations. Paper presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Virtual, November 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Staněk, F., Jin, G. and Simmons, J. [2022]. Fracture imaging using DAS-recorded microseismic events.Frontiers in Earth Science, 10, 907749.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Stork, A.L., Baird, A.F., Horne, S.A., Naldrett, G., Lapins, S., Kendall, J-M., Wookey, J., Verdon, J.P., Clarke, A. and Williams, A. [2020]. Application of machine learning to microseismic event detection in Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) data:Geophysics, 85, KS149–KS160. DOI: 10.1190/geo2019‑0774.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2019-0774.1 [Google Scholar]
16. Stork, A., et al. [2022]. Monitoring CO2 injection with passive and active seismic surveys: Case study from the Hellisheiði geothermal field, Iceland.Proceedings of the 16th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference (GHGT-16) 23–24 Oct 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Tuinstra, K., Grigoli, F., Lanza, F., Rinaldi, A. P., Fichtner, A., and Wiemer, S. [2023]. Locating clustered seismicity using Distance Geometry Solvers: applications for sparse and single-borehole DAS networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16317.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Vera Rodriguez, I. et al. [2023]. Continuous, Long-term DAS Microseismic Monitoring Trial in the Shell QUEST CCS Site in Alberta, Canada. Carbon Capture Canada CCUS Convention, 10–12 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
19. White, D. et al. [2019]. Seven years of 4D seismic monitoring at the Aqui-store CO2 Storage Site, Saskatchewan, Canada, SEG Int Exposition & 89th Annual Meeting, 4918–4922, doi:10.1190/segam2019‑3216776.1.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2019-3216776.1 [Google Scholar]